Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
Is it a "known fact" that follows only from the fact that the constitution was a constitution of the US? Or are there deliberations from the constitutional convention that suggest this to be the case?
18 posted on 08/28/2002 11:34:07 PM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: ffrancone
I know that when the BOR was passed, Madison, among others, lamented the fact that it did not apply to the states as well, and hoped that followup amendments would be passed that would do so. And looking at the arguments raised by anti-federalists against ratifying the Constitution, and later urging that a bill of rights be added to it, it's clear that these people did not fear their own state governments, but we're extremely unnerved at the prospect of a powerful federal state. They demanded, and received, a bill of rights in order to keep that federal government in check. The last thing they wanted was a fedgov with the power to restrict the policies of individual states.
19 posted on 08/29/2002 11:50:10 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson