Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An 'Authentic' Conservative, Buchanan Parts With Bush
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY ^ | Wednesday, August 28, 2002 | BY BRIAN MITCHELL

Posted on 08/28/2002 9:16:46 AM PDT by sixmil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-302 next last
To: PuNcH
And the Crips, Bloods, and Gangster Disciples don't commit murders?
21 posted on 08/28/2002 10:21:27 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
The new, bi-weekly magazine will debut next month and be called "The American Conservative."

"The American Socialist" would be more appropriate for a magazine founded by Buchanan.

22 posted on 08/28/2002 10:21:30 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
You believe the remark that "The reason they were over here on 9-11 is that we are over there." is on target? I think not. Also he repeats the lie that the President is going to war without the approval of Congress. Bush has clearly stated he would get approval from Congress...

"Publicly, White House spokesmen say Bush would still consult Congress on any decision regarding war on Iraq."

Source

It was the WH lawyer, Alex Gonzales who stated Bush did not need Congressional approval, HE does NOT make the decisions, in fact, although true, it was a very stupid thing for him to say publicly. To top that, Congress has already given their approval to topple Saddam already, via H. CON. RES. 286, dated Dec 11, 2001, the last paragraph which states:

"Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2151 note) declares that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime of Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Congress supports the President in using all means at his disposal to encourage the establishment of a democratically elected government in Iraq."

Source: Thomas Legislation Archives

23 posted on 08/28/2002 10:22:09 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
there seems to be a sense of bitterness about him.

It's all in your head. He seems very even handed and sometimes even happy-go-lucky.
24 posted on 08/28/2002 10:22:43 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
"Patrick J. Buchanan isn't giving up. He's left the Republican Party for good. And he isn't planning a fourth run for the White House."

I'm sure the Satanic Druids and Illuminatis are relieved!

25 posted on 08/28/2002 10:23:52 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
"The American Socialist" would be more appropriate for a magazine founded by Buchanan.

Would you care to explain this comment? Please be specific and explain exactly how Buchanan is even remotely "Socialist". If you point out his views on Globalisation you'll have to then support the claim that that position is in fact Socialist, and explain how.
26 posted on 08/28/2002 10:24:35 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
I have concelled NR after being a subscriber since I was 16. I will try Buchanan's mag.

I know the feeling.

27 posted on 08/28/2002 10:26:10 AM PDT by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Bush has clearly stated he would get approval from Congress

That's funny. Just yesterday they made a public affirmation that Administration legal counsel has determined that Bush does NOT need Congress's approval. If he did ask them it would only be a formality to get people to stop crying.
28 posted on 08/28/2002 10:26:34 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
And the Crips, Bloods, and Gangster Disciples don't commit murders?

DPS intelligence reports said Mexico-based rings were responsible for half of all homicides in Maricopa County.

29 posted on 08/28/2002 10:27:05 AM PDT by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Bush has clearly stated he would get approval from Congress...

"Publicly, White House spokesmen say Bush would still consult Congress on any decision regarding war on Iraq."

You no speaka the english? Since when does "consult" mean the same as "get approval"? You guys sure play loose with the facts when it suits your twisted agenda.

30 posted on 08/28/2002 10:30:23 AM PDT by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Pat, how about "The American Sore Loser" as a working title. You can get Gore and McKinney as contributing columnists.

I fully agree with you, Pat Buchanan is the biggest blow hard around. What makes him think he has any credibility left?

31 posted on 08/28/2002 10:30:37 AM PDT by CaliforniaOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PuNcH
And you've not answered my question.
32 posted on 08/28/2002 10:34:19 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Containment and deterrence will work with almost any state.

Except those who die for Allah and could care less about loss of life in any country. Buchanan is wrong on this. The best defense is a good offense. He may be conservative but he doesn't understand self-defense.

I also disagree with him vehemently on Israel. Buchanan sees both sides as equal which leads me to believe he is clueless about this religious war we are in, and he is clueless as to the religious nature of the war in Israel. He needs to bone up on radical islam. I will be glad to send him "Islamic Invasion" by Dr. Robert Morey if he needs an education.

33 posted on 08/28/2002 10:34:30 AM PDT by exmarine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
As much as I think Pat is a crank, I think he could actually do well with a magazine.
34 posted on 08/28/2002 10:34:52 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Just a future failure for Pat. Something he's used to.
35 posted on 08/28/2002 10:36:36 AM PDT by Glenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I dont need you to see where your coming from and I dont have to spell it out for anyone else.
36 posted on 08/28/2002 10:37:00 AM PDT by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CaliforniaOkie
I fully agree with you, Pat Buchanan is the biggest blow hard around. What makes him think he has any credibility left?

So don't watch his show and don't buy his magazine, then. Why whine about it?

37 posted on 08/28/2002 10:37:22 AM PDT by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
You said it exactly right..."Administration legal counsel has determined". They do NOT make the final decisions, their job is to RECOMMEND a course of action. Every article I have ever read on this has the WH spokespeople stating that they will consult Congress before taking action, despite what the "Administrative legal counsel has determined".
38 posted on 08/28/2002 10:37:26 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
Except those who die for Allah and could care less about loss of life in any country. Buchanan is wrong on this.

Wrong! If the elites and the American intellegentsia -- left and right -- had heeded Buchanan's calls for tighter borders years ago we never would have had these homocidal ragheads in our country! Pat was right then and he is right now.

39 posted on 08/28/2002 10:39:39 AM PDT by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
"Except those who die for Allah and could care less about loss of life in any country. Buchanan is wrong on this. The best defense is a good offense. He may be conservative but he doesn't understand self-defense."

Maybe so. I guess we should start in on Pakistan then, too?

Regarding your comment on Israel, does that mean you believe that the Palestinians are less entitled to a state than are the Israelis?
40 posted on 08/28/2002 10:40:33 AM PDT by rogerthedodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson