Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An 'Authentic' Conservative, Buchanan Parts With Bush
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY ^ | Wednesday, August 28, 2002 | BY BRIAN MITCHELL

Posted on 08/28/2002 9:16:46 AM PDT by sixmil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-302 next last
To: rdb3
You met "Uncle Ron?" That's why my dad called him and became a "Reagan Democrat." He loved how he showed the ATC the door for going on strike when it violated their contract.

I met him in 1980, at his campaign appearance in San Diego the night before the election. Shook hands, he asked me my name, and asked if I was going to vote for him in 1984 (I was only 15).

Remember when he told the heckler, "Aw, SHUT UP!"?

I knew the heckler, he was two years ahead of me at Patrick Henry High School. OK computer dweeb, but otherwise a bit of a jerk.

121 posted on 08/28/2002 12:12:39 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
The ultimate question is whether there's going to be a Jewish state in the Mideast

If Pat were King, I'm sure this would be so. He would abandon our long time ally like Clinton dumped Lewinsky, in a heart beat.

Pat is so clueless on foreign affairs he still thinks WW2 was a mistake on Roosevelts part. Even with the benefit of hindsight his brand of isolationism pulls the wool right over his eyes.

I agree with Pat on securing the borders from illegals and on protecting the life of the unborn.

I disagree with Pat that pulling the covers over you head and hoping the Husseins of the world go away before you wake up is a substitute for foreign policy. That difference is so profound I put Pat only a few notches ahead of Harry the Hat as far as getting my vote goes.

122 posted on 08/28/2002 12:13:08 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
I think that, too.

I also think, that were he in the position George W. Bush is in, he'd probably be acting little differently Bush Jr. is. It's simply a matter of priorities.

Right now, the war has priority.
123 posted on 08/28/2002 12:13:12 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
You just go the right direction. I'm headed there, too.

I'm no one's leader.

124 posted on 08/28/2002 12:15:19 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
You don't think much of Reagan, do you?

He was a damn good President, and definitely the greatest of the post-WW2 bunch. (I think Teddy Roosevelt edges Reagan out as the best of the century, though.)

I do fault him for not getting rid of the ABM Treaty and not going into a practical strategic defense program instead of a series of studies and technology demonstrations--in that, I think that he and his advisers were "captured by the system."

But I do credit him with throwing the gauntlet down in front of Gorby--I still get shivers when I hear the speech, "Mr. Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!"

125 posted on 08/28/2002 12:18:17 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Of what advantage is all this American empire, interfering in all these quarrels around the world, if as a consequence we lose freedom at home and live in constant danger of some kind of small atomic weapon detonated on American soil?

No entangling alliances bump!
126 posted on 08/28/2002 12:18:23 PM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
"Hey, if you think I am offtopic, you know where the abuse button is. "

Never used it. I am not part of the thought censor hit squad. Besides I'd rather people see your approach to rational discussion. You censor ideas you can't refute by changing the topic.

127 posted on 08/28/2002 12:20:16 PM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
But they were men. Nothing but men. But you wouldn't know that listening to some people.

Those men understood that which is why they made the Constitution amendable. You're right, they should not be deified but respected for what they did correctly.

They also knew that men were endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights and the three they spoke of were life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That they didn't all practice it makes those words no less important. That one they got right.

128 posted on 08/28/2002 12:21:19 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I concur that we should honor them for their accomplishments and founding this nation.

But their deification grates me.

129 posted on 08/28/2002 12:23:21 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
I bet you voted for Perot, didn't you. Or are
you related to him? You certainly talk like him.

Is this your piece de resistance?  Wow.
I'm just blown away.

130 posted on 08/28/2002 12:24:20 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
"It is just a case of someone trying to muddy the waters for Bush."

Sadly, there are those among us who bill themselve as "conservative" who will believe anything...as long as it reflects badly on Bush. 'Course, most of them are sitting in a haze of smoke from a substance they'd like to have legalized, too.

131 posted on 08/28/2002 12:25:10 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
all deserve a family ass-whipping, and I'm just the one to do it.

OK tough guy. You go for it. But you might want to research the intellectual origins of a movement you claim to be a part of. I certainly would.

132 posted on 08/28/2002 12:26:23 PM PDT by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
But their deification grates me.

Yeah, I get sick of the old guy quotefests myself.

133 posted on 08/28/2002 12:27:02 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
You censor ideas you can't refute by changing the topic.

Yeah, I'm the forum censor, except it hasn't
done much to close you down, has it?

134 posted on 08/28/2002 12:27:41 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Yeah, I get sick of the old guy quotefests myself.

Yeah...just a bunch of dead white guys. Feels like I am on DU website or somesuch liberal crap site. You guys are bizarre. Certainly not conservative -- ever looked up the meaning of the word "conserve"? Didn't think so.

135 posted on 08/28/2002 12:29:34 PM PDT by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Ever time anything concerning Pat's opinion on anything is posted a gaggle of spouters of ad hominem attacks comes forward. Seldom do they address anything discussed in the article.

One very curious thing, despite their antipathy for the man and their opinion that he is of no consequence they feel it is worth their time to repeat their attacks upon him ad nauseum.

I have read their comments about his "anti-semitism". I have read their references. I might have a tendency to believe them if their comments weren't so blatantly taken out of context or slanted.

I plan to look into subscribing to the magazine. It should be worth a look. With enemies like these, he couldn't be all wrong.

Regards.

136 posted on 08/28/2002 12:31:26 PM PDT by The Irishman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
A Neo-Con is a Reagan Republican.Believers in economic growth, strong defence, traditional values, limited gov't.Its getting to those goals that cause the heartburn ;-)

137 posted on 08/28/2002 12:32:32 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Oh, I see....if we are not "Randians, Libertarians, and John Birchers" we are not conservatives in your "mind."
138 posted on 08/28/2002 12:32:38 PM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Zviadist
Conserve this shmuck. You've got no credibility with me pal. You issued alarmist warnings on the attack on Afghanistan. The Russians couldn't do it, the British were thrown out on their asses, blah, blah, blah.

To me, your posts are worthless. By chance most people are correct more times than you when you're trying to be. You are a statistical anomaly.

139 posted on 08/28/2002 12:35:57 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
I still don't understand Buchanan's sympathy toward the Palestinians, but the rest is right on target.

The rest is right on target? Buchanan is a psychopath!! Good Lord, to think ANYONE supports his mindset, is frightening to say the least.

140 posted on 08/28/2002 12:37:17 PM PDT by Vets_Husband_and_Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson