Skip to comments.
Ohio court: Local health boards can't ban smoking
USA Today ^
| August 8, 2002
Posted on 08/28/2002 10:10:27 AM PDT by HighWheeler
Edited on 04/13/2004 1:39:50 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP)
(Excerpt) Read more at usatoday.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ohio; smoking; supremecourt
Libs take another hit.
To: HighWheeler
Anti-tobacco smoking = liberal=bad thing.
Anti-marijuana smoking=conservative=good thing.
Anti-antis=libertarian=the consistent viewpoint.
2
posted on
08/28/2002 10:15:00 AM PDT
by
gcruse
To: HighWheeler
Buckeye bump
3
posted on
08/28/2002 10:15:00 AM PDT
by
muggs
To: HighWheeler
Glad to hear it!
4
posted on
08/28/2002 10:21:00 AM PDT
by
goodieD
To: HighWheeler
Ohioans in general lean libertarian and the elected Supreme Court knows it. So does the legislature, which typically writes very exact laws in order to prevent localities from going above and beyond state law. The way I interpret this ruling, not even
city councils can pass anti-smoking-in-bars ordinances.
Nannies across the state just got served notice.
-Eric
5
posted on
08/28/2002 10:34:30 AM PDT
by
E Rocc
To: HighWheeler
bttt
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson