[joesnuffy]

Kinda problematic...the terrorist are real and living among us..giving away American citizenship and opening our borders during Clintons regime..has brought this on our heads...
Do we keep a free and open society only to have that freedom used against us by terrorist/citizens/immigrants?...Its not like the prez doesnt have a legit case for ending PCA but on the other hand...imagine Hillary getting her grubby mits on such power...

[45Auto]

"The federal government is no longer restrained by law. It can circumvent any legal barrier. The only force keeping officials in line is fear of losing office. Washington has instituted corruption, plunder, waste, and war on the American people--while claiming to be our public servants. It is no longer a joke to say politicians are crooks. With all the power they wield, they're a threat to human life."

The only safe course of action is to insist upon a restrained government. ALL politicians seek to enhance their power at the expense of liberty. The Constitutional Militia, i.e., every able-bodied male (and some others) can take care of domestic terrorists, city by city, town by town.

[45Auto]

It doesn't take a genius to see what has to be done to enhance the security of the nation within its own borders: 1)Close the border with Mexico and station US troops there. 2) Profile those people from those nations known to harbor/support terrorism. 3)Activate the Constitutional Militia. 4)Be alert in your own town.5)Arm the airline pilots.

We don't need to destroy the Bill of Rights in order to be safer.

[Ranger Drew]

I don't view it as problematic at all. I am perfectly capable, as are my sons, of defending my home, family, and community. I don't need the military in my own front yard. If my government disarms me, however, that's a different story altogether. That indicates to me that to my government, I, AS AN ARMED AMERICAN CITIZEN, am the real terrorist,...and not those islamic types.