Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Wants Clamp on Clinton Pardons Scandal
NewsMax ^ | Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2002 | Phil Brennan

Posted on 08/28/2002 3:23:53 PM PDT by Mark Felton

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: Jim Robinson
You want to go after a Clinton, make it Hillary. She's a thousand times more dangerous to our future than Bill.
AMEN to that, Jim.

Of course, on the surface this looks like nothing more that the powerful protecting the powerful. But it could very well be that the Bush team is well-aware that if they push this issue the democrats and their pals in the elitist Media will immediatley go into full-scale "victim" mode...."Can't we just move on?", "Leave those poor Clintons alone", "You failed to convict him, now get over it", etc.

Of course all this information will come out eventually, and the Clinton spinners will desperately try to crucify the messenger...But that messenger will not be GWB.

21 posted on 08/28/2002 5:15:13 PM PDT by fagin62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Let's not forget Writs of Mandamus!
22 posted on 08/28/2002 5:17:27 PM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
I smell Opi.
23 posted on 08/28/2002 5:21:21 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
That's true. But I think if someone wants to dig dirt on the Clintons they should probably concentrate their efforts on the one that's currently in power. She's the one we can prosecute if something pans out. Also, any dirt found on her will probably tie back into some of Bill's dealings anyway. We had a two for one presidency. Maybe we can get a two for one prosecution.

Anyway, this was just my opinion. If Klayman or anyone else wants to continue these investigations, more power to them. I just happen to think they're wasting their time. However, I don't think it's a wise idea to start smearing Bush over it. Let the Democrats do their own dirty work and smear campaigning. If they smelled a rat here, I guarantee you they would slam the trap shut on Bush, even if they had to throw the Clintons to the wolves in the process. They would love nothing better than to knock Bush out of the White house. Daschle/Gephardt and Co would not be bothered in the least if Clinton/Gore and entourage were suddenly out of the political picture.

24 posted on 08/28/2002 5:23:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
A product that might interest you:
She Will Run! Hillary Clinton Plans for the Presidency
25 posted on 08/28/2002 5:24:12 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fagin62
I think you're exactly right!
26 posted on 08/28/2002 5:25:24 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fagin62
Good point.
27 posted on 08/28/2002 5:27:35 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Let the Democrats do their own dirty work and smear campaigning.

Boy, you sure lost me here, Jim. You think the DEMS are gonna expose Clinton?

28 posted on 08/28/2002 5:27:42 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
No, but the would welcome any opportunity to smear Bush.
29 posted on 08/28/2002 5:28:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Ah, well, then as a last resort, the people can always vote one or the other out. Hmmmm... been there, done that.

Nope, not quite, Jim. Clinton's surrogate lost by a hair! Really can't understand where you are coming from on this issue? ? ?

ps, those FBI files must be radioactive!

30 posted on 08/28/2002 5:32:22 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"However, I don't think it's a wise idea to start smearing Bush over it. Let the Democrats do their own dirty work and smear campaigning. If they smelled a rat here, I guarantee you they would slam the trap shut on Bush, even if they had to throw the Clintons to the wolves in the process."

Right!
31 posted on 08/28/2002 5:33:53 PM PDT by windchime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Yeah, right. Just connect the dots. Nothing to it. Hahahahahahha.
32 posted on 08/28/2002 5:35:06 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Hillary

Hillary Clinton Plans For The Presidency: Know The Real Hillary Clinton! The Story the Media Won't Report

Special Introduction by Phil Brennan

Is Hillary Clinton gearing up for a run at the White House in 2004? She says no, but given her past inability to establish even a distant relationship with the truth, her denial should be taken with a least one large grain of salt! This NewsMax Exclusive Report reveals what really lies beneath the pithy "HillarySpin" sound bites. This well-researched report is your invitation to meet the real Hillary Clinton – the one you will never see while she's in front of television cameras or while she appears before any microphone. This report exposes Hillary's true nature, her fiery temper and the extent of her knowledge and involvement in every Clinton administration scandal. Information is power – get to know the real Hillary Clinton before it's too late!

Price: FREE - just pay the standard shipping charge of $4.95


We wouldn't want to tarnish her, would we?

Let's let the whore of Babylon take her rightful position.

33 posted on 08/28/2002 5:36:14 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
"Can she really distance herself from all that?"

Without a doubt.Probably even go through a sham divorce to end their sham marriage just to put another one over on the sheeple.These people are devious to a fault.

34 posted on 08/28/2002 5:38:39 PM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
So what else is new?

GWB has never met a democrat a$$ he hasn't wanted to kiss.

It's BIPARTISANSHIP dunt ya know!

35 posted on 08/28/2002 5:39:04 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fagin62
the Bush team is well-aware that if they push this issue the democrats and their pals in the elitist Media will immediatley go into full-scale "victim" mode...."Can't we just move on?", "Leave those poor Clintons alone", "You failed to convict him, now get over it", etc.

So Dubya preemptively takes their advice and "moves along", burying the information until decades after the 'Toon gets his head carved into Mt. Rushmore.
Traitor Lott initiated that GOP policy with the derailment of the Senate trial.

36 posted on 08/28/2002 5:39:34 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
My oh my.....the Clintons must sure have the goods on the Bushes. There is no other valid explanation for this story.
37 posted on 08/28/2002 5:42:38 PM PDT by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windchime
"However, I don't think it's a wise idea to start smearing Bush over it.

Huh?

How does Bush get smeared by exposing Slick?

38 posted on 08/28/2002 5:44:01 PM PDT by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
You tell me. You are one of the ones doing it on this very thread. Let's see, Bush is hiding stuff, Bush is involved in bribery, the Bushes and Clintons are in it together, there's no difference, etc.
39 posted on 08/28/2002 5:52:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast
Oh, yeah, and we can't forget those radioactive FBI Files. Clinton definitely has the dirt on Bush and is blackmailing him. The whole world is held hostage (again) by the bar bouncer. Bwahahahahahah.
40 posted on 08/28/2002 5:54:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson