Replies

"You want to go after a Clinton, make it Hillary. She's a thousand times more dangerous to our future than Bill."

When you are right you are right, and boy are you right about that one.

However, it does beg a fair question. Since Bill Clinton's administration was so very slimy then perhaps digging up enough dirt on it and keeping it in the public eye just might serve to put a damper on Hillary's political ambitions. The Marc Rich pardon is awfully stinky. It's got that deep, nauseating, long term kind of stink that just keeps on giving. I'm not sure she's tricky enough to avoid a load of dirt that stinky. Remember that whole "Two for the price of one, co-presidents" spiel they did early in their career? Can she really distance herself from all that?

That's true. But I think if someone wants to dig dirt on the Clintons they should probably concentrate their efforts on the one that's currently in power. She's the one we can prosecute if something pans out. Also, any dirt found on her will probably tie back into some of Bill's dealings anyway. We had a two for one presidency. Maybe we can get a two for one prosecution.

Anyway, this was just my opinion. If Klayman or anyone else wants to continue these investigations, more power to them. I just happen to think they're wasting their time. However, I don't think it's a wise idea to start smearing Bush over it. Let the Democrats do their own dirty work and smear campaigning. If they smelled a rat here, I guarantee you they would slam the trap shut on Bush, even if they had to throw the Clintons to the wolves in the process. They would love nothing better than to knock Bush out of the White house. Daschle/Gephardt and Co would not be bothered in the least if Clinton/Gore and entourage were suddenly out of the political picture.

"Can she really distance herself from all that?"

Without a doubt.Probably even go through a sham divorce to end their sham marriage just to put another one over on the sheeple.These people are devious to a fault.