Skip to comments.
Nightmare of crack nicotine
Washington Times ^
| 8/29/02
| Jack Wheeler
Posted on 08/28/2002 11:10:30 PM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
In my book, smoking tobacco is unfathomably stupid. About the only thing more lethally dumb are extortionate taxes on tobacco.
Egged on by anti-tobacco activists, politicians in state after state around the country are indulging in an orgy of greed. Tobacco taxes have become a golden goose for government coffers. With a city tax alone of $1.50, a pack of cigarettes now costs $7.50 in New York City. The tobacco companies' standard objection is that higher taxes will lead to more cigarette smuggling. The anti-tobacco crowd's standard response is to demand adjacent cities and states have ever-higher tobacco taxes as well.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
1
posted on
08/28/2002 11:10:30 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Please join the Smoker's Tea Party by getting your cigarettes on line from overseas. I use yesmoke.com and pay $14.95 per carton for my Camel 100's. Some brands are cheaper! They are reliable. Order in large amounts and frequently as they do get out of your brand and you have to wait to reorder. Also, I pay the $2 extra for priority shipping....supposed to be here in 6-8 days. They took 10 days to arrive in NV. Still they arrived and are excellent. Let's show the government that we're not going to take it anymore. Let's deprive them of our tax dollars that they use to support every socialist program they can come up with except smoker's health! Spread the word.
2
posted on
08/28/2002 11:21:43 PM PDT
by
brat
To: kattracks
Awesome article.
3
posted on
08/28/2002 11:21:46 PM PDT
by
Destro
To: SheLion
ping
4
posted on
08/28/2002 11:23:16 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: brat; SheLion
I use yesmoke.com and pay $14.95 per carton for my Camel 100's. That comes out to about $1.50 a pack.
I'm still makin' my own and paying about 75 cents.
Nico-Nazis be damned.
5
posted on
08/29/2002 12:04:26 AM PDT
by
uglybiker
To: kattracks
Well, there it is, a blueprint for a new illegal drug industry. I have been predicting a re-run of prohibition, but hadn't thought about the "crack" angle. This is scary.
To: kattracks
WindMinstrel;realpatriot71;Wolfie;Hemingway's Ghost;vin-one;Dakmar;EBUCK;steve50;headsonpikes;Xenalyte;nunya bidness;Beach_Babe ping
If you want off this ping list FReepMail Me!
7
posted on
08/29/2002 2:58:06 AM PDT
by
JediGirl
To: WindMinstrel; realpatriot71; Wolfie; Hemingway's Ghost; vin-one; Dakmar; EBUCK; steve50; ...
woops. maybe i should try preview every once in a while...
If you want off this ping list FReepMail Me!
8
posted on
08/29/2002 2:59:35 AM PDT
by
JediGirl
To: All
Now, are we gonna make the same stupid mistake with nicotine or do we stop it before it comes to the first deaths by "crack nicotine" ?
Anyone wanna bet?
9
posted on
08/29/2002 3:21:06 AM PDT
by
SkyRat
To: kattracks
I quit smoking in 1998, after 35 years, when I was diagnosed with lung cancer and given less than a year to live. Thanks to God, good doctors and a special diet, I'm still here. And I still want a cigarette in the worst way sometimes. I think it's like being an alcoholic: you take one day at a time.
Carolyn
10
posted on
08/29/2002 3:33:28 AM PDT
by
CDHart
To: kattracks
Could be I'm just not getting it. Most smokers aren't looking for evermore-intense "highs" from nicotine. They just want the fix on a regular basis through the day. Cigarettes do the job for most. Crack nicotine? Sounds like a new designer drug to attract the "daring".
A few smokers I know are getting great bargains from Indian tribes, such as joessmokes, I think it's called.
Has anyone in this country ever believed that the antismokers, the tax-the-smokers, the sue-the-tobacco-company folks actually give a rip about the health of smokers? And all of them are just too dumb to realize that smokers won't pay those high taxes.
One thing concerns me. The left wouldn't mind seeing smokers get into smuggling. The left hates our rule of law, anyway, and if they can encourage a lawless element, they'll consider it a bonus.
To: WaterDragon
Could be I'm just not getting it. Most smokers aren't looking for evermore- intense "highs" from nicotine. They just want the fix on a regular basis through the day. Cigarettes do the job for most. Crack nicotine? Sounds like a new designer drug to attract the "daring".
The question is, if a regular smoker can't afford normal ciggarettes anymore, how long till he is desperate enough to try crack nicotine for the daily fix?
I'm a smoker, although I tend to have 6 to 12 months breaks before I start smoking again for 3 months or so. When I'm forced to stop although I don't want I would probably start chewing my fingernails till they bleed. I'm not proud of that, but it's the truth. Daily fix is a mighty motivator when you don't get it
12
posted on
08/29/2002 3:42:01 AM PDT
by
SkyRat
To: kattracks
Wow. A How-To dissertation on how to distill the drug, and a sales pitch on how lucrative such a drug would be. Seems to me, this guy wants to kick-start the nicotine-crack industry.
13
posted on
08/29/2002 3:54:51 AM PDT
by
Junior
To: SkyRat
But there are the Indian tribes, and as one poster here noted, overseas sources. It really isn't true that smokers have to pay those taxes. In fact, that's exactly why tax revenue from tobacco goes down (I've heard) when the taxes go through the ceiling.
To: Junior
Seems to me, this guy wants to kick-start the nicotine-crack industry.
I dont think so. What he told is nothing new. As it has been said in the article, every high school student could do it. It's not really a high classified secret.
He only describes what could happen, what is going to happen, if the taxs on ciggarretts rise enough to make the junkies desperate.
This is what happened during the alcohol prohibition.
15
posted on
08/29/2002 4:03:45 AM PDT
by
SkyRat
To: WaterDragon
It really isn't true that smokers have to pay those taxes
Not now, true. I think they have to, sooner or later.
Wanna bet?
16
posted on
08/29/2002 4:05:19 AM PDT
by
SkyRat
To: kattracks
The author is incredibly misinformed.
Nicotine in such concentrations would kill immediately. One drop of it in solution on the skin can kill.
To: Junior
I thought it read like a new product line a Cigarette company was working on.
To: FairWitness
I have been predicting a re-run of prohibition You've been "predicting" a re-run of Prohibition? The current re-run under the moniker Drug War somehow escaped your attention?
19
posted on
08/29/2002 4:23:51 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
The subject was nicotine and smoking, but thanks anyway.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson