Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spny
This is certainly troubling information, but Bush hasn't taken any sort of hard line against the Saudis. Why not? I suspect the answer lies beneath the Saudi desert.

That's certainly part of it. However, there are obvious military reasons for being interested in the surface of the desert, too -- advantages that would disappear should we ever decide to kick the Saudis in the chops.

It's a tightrope walk, for sure. But I think we've still got the upper hand, because the precarious position of the Saudi royalty would become untenable if they simply kicked us out. Saudi support for terrorism is probably less a matter of sympathy, than it is a matter of bribing the mullahs to leave them alone.

15 posted on 08/29/2002 9:51:20 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
"Saudi support for terrorism is probably less a matter of sympathy, than it is a matter of bribing the mullahs to leave them alone."

You've got THAT right. If we pull out of Saudi, and Saudi turns into another 1979-Iran.

17 posted on 08/29/2002 9:54:09 AM PDT by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson