To: Tumbleweed_Connection
According to Colgate's memo, the secure phones were simply too dangerous for American citizens.
If American citizens could have used them, so could Al Qaeda terrorists. Do we want to give up the ability to wiretap well-funded criminal and terror groups when necessary?
To: Looking for Diogenes
Just curious why the Leftists were so enamored with the "opportunities" at the time yet condemned our administration for not fully informing terrorists of Constitutional rights? Why does that seem hypocritical?
To: Looking for Diogenes
The Al Queda terrorists are using encryption now. This policy only made sure that American Citizens would have no privacy from government agents.
An excellent analogy that you might find interesting is located at: www.geektimes.com/michael/culture/humor/items/Privacy-related/TransparentTreesAnalogy.html
To: Looking for Diogenes
If gore wanted to do this in 93 how far can the bush admin. be from doing it now?
11 posted on
08/29/2002 8:31:11 PM PDT by
thepitts
To: Looking for Diogenes
"If American citizens could have used them, so could Al Qaeda terrorists. Do we want to give up the ability to wiretap well-funded criminal and terror groups when necessary?"
I am certain that a similar argument was used to justify the Quartering Act, in which British soldiers were housed in colonist's homes, to cut down on 'illegal' smuggling of tea and other products that did not bear a stamp that the tax was paid.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson