Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I took the Simon Gay Agenda-SCAM -Hook, Line and Sinker.
http://simonforgovernor.com ^ | 8/31/02 | jimbaugh

Posted on 08/31/2002 5:22:39 PM PDT by Jimbaugh

Edited on 08/31/2002 10:15:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last
To: Jimbaugh
Lessons for Conservatives:

1.) Never jump on your candidate based on stories coming out of the liberal press. Nine times out of ten, they've got it wrong ... on purpose.

2.) Take Ronald Reagan's advice and don't bad-mouth a fellow Republican -- particularly if the DemocRat he's running against is as filthy dirty as Gay Doofus.
101 posted on 09/01/2002 8:51:42 PM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Ich war falsch und ich entschuldige mich für das Besmirching den guten Namen der Bill Simon.

Cool. Now do Japanese!
102 posted on 09/01/2002 8:54:25 PM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
if he comes out strongly against the war in Iraq.

Just curious. What, exactly, does the Gov. of California have to do with war in Iraq or anywhere else? Why must he take a position on an issue he has nothing to do with?
103 posted on 09/01/2002 9:14:34 PM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Commie Basher
Libertarians are pro-choice on everything.

Yeah, I know. Even on issues where one has no right to 'chose.' Like on whether or not to own slaves, have sex with your children, or smoke crack. A party so absolutely devoted to such a flawed principle is doomed to an eternal 2-3% of the vote, if that.
104 posted on 09/01/2002 9:17:44 PM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Just curious. What, exactly, does the Gov. of California have to do with war in Iraq or anywhere else? Why must he take a position on an issue he has nothing to do with?

He needn't, he's free to run his campaign as he sees fit. But "war with Iraq" seems to become the core defining issue of the GOP at the moment. Taxes, regulation, free trade, affirmative action, all have been pushed aside because "there's a war on!" Every time someone points out how Bush has backtracked, Bushie globalists say: "The adults are busy right now. In case you haven't heard, there's a war on!"

Well, since it's become the defining issue of the GOP, I see a vote for the GOP as a vote for war. Thus, I hesitate voting for any GOP candidate, unless he or she makes it clear that no vote for them can be misinterpreted as a vote for war.

I opposed the Gulf War, and felt clean and proud to have voted for Ron Paul over Bush Sr. when that war was launched. I now feel dirty having voted for Bush Jr. in 2000. I want to feel clean again. I cannot do so if my vote implies a support for war.

105 posted on 09/02/2002 7:45:40 AM PDT by Commie Basher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Jimbaugh
Bill Simon’s strong pro-family position
Sunday, September 01 @ 21:10:51 EDT Politics / Legislation


Over the last week, as many of you know, concerns have been raised over a questionnaire supposedly approved by gubernatorial candidate Bill Simon.

I have spoken with him during this time. The following letter addressed to Senator Ray Haynes, I believe, clarifies Bill Simon’s strong pro-family position.

Please feel free to share this information with your friends, family, church members and co-workers in California and throughout the nation.

Rev. Louis P. Sheldon
Chairman, Traditional Values Coalition



September 1, 2002

Honorable Ray Haynes
California State Senator
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814

Dear Ray:

I want to express my appreciation for your recent letter of support. Your friendship and guidance during this campaign has been nothing less than invaluable. I look forward to working closely with you to provide California with the leadership we so desperately need.

I have always tried to be a caring and compassionate person and to understand the differing viewpoints of people from all walks of life. I want to set forth clearly and unambiguously my strongly held pro-family views that have recently been mischaracterized.

I signed the Marriage Protection Pledge on February 6, 2002, and stand by it. That pledge is to protect children by supporting the ideal of marriage, protect the importance and uniqueness of marriage and to uphold the pro-marriage, pro-child spirit of Proposition 22.

In the primary campaign, I stated that "marriage is an institution that should remain between one man and one woman." I stand by that statement. I supported Proposition 22 because I believe that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. Marriage is a special relationship designed to create a loving and caring environment for families to develop and thrive.

I opposed AB 25, which conferred rights based on sexual orientation, and I encouraged Governor Davis to exercise his veto power against it. Unfortunately, he signed it into law. That has been my clear position at all times because I do not believe that other relationships should be elevated to that of marriage. I oppose creating a special class of domestic partnership laws that is defined by sexual orientation or preference.

I do not support a proclamation for Gay Pride Day.

The best family environment for a child is a home with a mother and father. Much of my own personal charitable giving has been in promoting adoptions and working for an environment that helps children to prosper in a loving home. We know that there is a good supply of such homes waiting for children, and we should redouble our efforts to make adoption easier. I want to ensure that every effort is made for the best possible environment for children. Also, I oppose legislation imposing sexual orientation training guidelines for foster parents.

As a state legislator, you have been on the front lines in fighting against the strong, liberal bias in the Assembly and Senate. There are many laws we would like to repeal or change, but as you know, only the legislature can repeal laws. As governor I must focus on achieving real results for Californians, which is what I intend to do.

As governor, I would hire only the most qualified people for each position, as I have in my business.

On the subject of private companies providing workplace domestic partnership benefits, I believe in a free market that corporations can make their own decisions on pay, benefits and working conditions. However, I strongly opposed AB 1080, which would prohibit state agencies from entering into contracts with vendors who do not offer benefits to domestic partner employees. This is another example of government mandates that drive away businesses and cost jobs for our citizens. I support portable health policies so individuals can choose their own coverage.

This letter should clear up any misunderstandings about my positions on the above issues. As a strong pro-family candidate, I took clear stands on these issues during the primary campaign. I will continue to do so, and as governor, I will unequivocally affirm my support for these and other major issues that concern the people of California.

Sincerely,

William E. Simon Jr.


 

106 posted on 09/02/2002 11:16:16 AM PDT by Jimbaugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
I truly don't mind beig jumped onto for any of my opinions. I dislike very much how the same folks gang up on those outside what passes for mainstream on this forum. Right away on any thread such as this, you and your cadre (RedBloodedAmerican, DaughterofIwoJimaVet, etal) call out the hounds. It is obvious to the rest of us who are becoming increasingly the outsiders. Persist in this behavior and FR will continue to bleed away long time members (and contibutors.) I choose to stay because the other forums software are not YET up to the quality of FR. When they inevitably catch up, this wolf pack behavior will drive me away.
107 posted on 09/02/2002 11:16:20 AM PDT by realpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson