Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2002 7:42:31 AM PDT by Brian Mosely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Brian Mosely
>>One of the Things I'm Most Disturbed By Since the Attacks Is the Tame Acceptance of the Idea That the Decision for War or Peace is President Bush's To Make By Himself<<

This bothers me, as well.

Doesn't it bother you?

2 posted on 09/01/2002 7:44:26 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Mosely; All
Boy, we've got 9-11 Bush hit pieces coming from all sides this week! The media paints the President as incompetent once again...I have been emailing these idiots all morning and hope other freepers will do the same. I also think that when the President comes out and makes his case to the American people, the journalists will look like fools once again.

My fellow freepers, many of these hit pieces on FR today are filled with "aides close to the President", unamed sources and "those that wish to remain anonymous"...it is my fondest wish that freepers will bury the media in email demanding that they name names and go back to the having two named sources. We can put a stop to this crap if we bury them in protest. It is not enough to merely carp on this web site.

4 posted on 09/01/2002 7:51:40 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Mosely
It would nice to be able to revist what these amgazines were saying just prior to the Gulf War
8 posted on 09/01/2002 8:31:54 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Mosely; All
Brian... on another thread I brought up the definition of the word "antinomianism".

The gist of Antinomianism is that there are those who rise above the 'rules' that govern the unwashed masses and thus are immune to such petty things as ethics, morality or social norms.

This was the purview of the Clintons and their ilk (Streisand comes to mind).

It's also the basis of the "Bush is too stupid to be President" (or Nixon, or Ford, Or Reagan, or Quayle or Bush 41).

You must understand this concept to fully appreciate the bankruptcy of liberalism.
13 posted on 09/01/2002 10:47:08 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Mosely
Another "historian," Doris Kearns and LBJ mistress was resurrected by MSNBC for her "insights." I thought she was through, but apparently not. Anyway, I haven't seen Deshowitz in ages and I hope I won't. Maybe his negative numbers finally scared the networks. Or have I just been lucky in missing him?
14 posted on 09/01/2002 10:54:20 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Brian Mosely
What I want to know is if these three "unbiased" historians signed that petition against Clinton's impeachment. Anybody know the answer to that?
16 posted on 09/01/2002 11:34:36 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson