[Roscoe]

The whole point of the acrticle was to point out neo-authortarian republicans just don't understand libertarianism

Conservatives understand libertarianism better than the neo-anarchist Libertarians do.

[Dan Day]

Conservatives understand libertarianism better than the neo-anarchist Libertarians do.

...so they keep trying to tell us, anyway.

[Trickyguy]

There are no conservatives anymore, only neo-cons. And
neo-cons are leftists but too stupid and ignorant to know it.

[tpaine]

What you (and others) sonstantly fail to see is that libertarianism is not approval of bad behavior, it is simply the secular ALLOWING of such behavior. You could live a totally spiritual life full of the light of Jesus and God, or you could live a life of total hedonism, wallowing in all carnal pleasures. Either way, the true libertarian doesn't care which you are - as long as you aren't harming anyone else.

Frankly, I don't know why authortarians such as yourself are tolerated on this website. I suppose you're left alone as either comic relief, or as some token contrarian to argue with, without which would turn this place into another "me-too" DU. Oh well.
The whole point of the article was to point out neo-authortarian republicans just don't understand libertarianism
9 - spodbox
__________________________________

Conservatives understand libertarianism better than the neo-anarchist Libertarians do.
10 - roscoe
_________________________________

But seeing you are NOT a 'conservative' roscoe, your point is not credible. You are one of the neo-authoritarian-communitarians, like curry.

BTW - Post 7 = 'F'
----- Post 9 = 'A+'