Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CARDINAL IN HOLY WAR OVER SCHOOLS.
N.Y. Post ^ | Sept. 2, 2002 | Carl Campanile

Posted on 09/02/2002 8:01:17 AM PDT by mware

CARDINAL IN HOLY WAR OVER SCHOOLS

By CARL CAMPANILE

September 2, 2002 -- EXCLUSIVE

Edward Cardinal Egan has charged that New York politicians are violating poor parents' "fundamental" rights by denying them the option to send their kids to parochial schools - instead forcing them into oft-failing public schools.

"Regrettably, many in public office have allowed political barriers to rise, and they are the ones who keep the barriers standing," Egan and other New York bishops said in a biting, 10-page pastoral letter on parental rights in education, a copy of which was obtained by The Post.

"We call for the creation of strategic alliances with members of all religious faiths, minority and ethnic communities, the business community and others to speak with one voice to uphold the rights of parents and to bring about fundamental reform of our educational policies."

The letter, titled "Every Parent, Every Child," says poor kids get short shrift because state lawmakers are bought off or kept in line by powerful teachers unions that support the status quo.

"They influence legislators not only through millions of dollars of direct contributions to political campaigns each year, but also through their own political activities designed to elect legislators who will support them and defeat those who will not," Egan and the bishops said of the unions.

It's the group's first policy statement since the U.S. Supreme Court in June OK'd a Cleveland program that gives poor parents public funds to enroll their children in parochial schools. For much of the year, Egan and the church have grappled with sex scandals involving priests.

The statement says a religious or private education should not be limited to those families who can afford tuition.

Church officials said many public schools in the poorest neighborhoods are terrible.

"Often, these government schools are ones parents would otherwise avoid because their academic performance is questionable or even failing. They are devoid of the moral standards that are important to the parents and, in some cases, they present a clear danger to the health and safety of children and teachers," the statement said.

Egan and the bishops recommended the following as part of a system overhaul:

* Taxpayer-funded vouchers or tax credits for parochial schooling, which would require a change in state law.

* Public funding enabling special-education students to attend religious schools.

* State aid for remedial instruction or tutoring for parochial-school students who score poorly on state standardized exams. The state attorney general has concluded that such funding would be legal.

* Government-funded resources for instructional materials and computers at all schools.

Parochial schools already receive government support for some of these services


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: publiceducation; vouchers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
I have had serious problems with Cardinal Egan, but one this one he is right on target.

VOUCHER BUMPS

1 posted on 09/02/2002 8:01:17 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mware
Good for Cardinal Egan!
2 posted on 09/02/2002 8:14:05 AM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
Nuttin wong wit pooblik skul .Ay wint thar.
3 posted on 09/02/2002 8:18:11 AM PDT by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady
LOL, I don't know if I should laugh or cry?
4 posted on 09/02/2002 8:20:14 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mware
Cardinal Egan may have made a mistake in the past over one of those sex-scandal cases, by trusting too much to the professional psychologists, but he is a good man. He is NOT another Cardinal Law.

I got to know him pretty well when he was Bishop of Bridgeport. His columns in the diocesan newspaper were faithful and true to the Church's teaching, including right-to-life issues. He went to Washington more than once for the annual right-to-life march, in the days when very few priests or bishops showed up. And he was named to his present post because the Pope judged him to be a good shepherd and faithful Catholic, worthy to follow Cardinal O'Connell.

5 posted on 09/02/2002 8:21:51 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
Egan's a solid conservative, so I've read. Good stand that he's taking.
6 posted on 09/02/2002 8:27:17 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I am glad to hear from someone who is familiar with Cardinal Egan. He had a difficult mission to take the reigns of the most beloved John Cardinal O'Connor.

I wish him well. He has remained faithful to the life issue and now is spearheading the voucher issue.

7 posted on 09/02/2002 8:27:53 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mware
I have problems with him too, and I agree with his conclusions here, but to raise the "have/have not" argument begs the merits of the issue. Also, the way he casts it is a bit specious since he accuses the state of denying the educational opportunities to poor kids, when it is specificially the Catholic School system that is denying the opportunity since they are the ones denying entry without the moolah. Also, you got to wonder if privitation and vouchers are best utilized in the direction of an instution that has NOW become synomous with sanctimonious CHILD ABUSE.
8 posted on 09/02/2002 8:28:19 AM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware
"The pedos are just looking for some fresh meat to molest! I bet they only want educational reform for boys age 5-12!"

*bigot mode off*

There, just wnated to get that out of the way in the hopes that the dirtball bigots decide to skip this thread.
9 posted on 09/02/2002 8:30:58 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scannell
specificially the Catholic School system that is denying the opportunity since they are the ones denying entry without the moolah.

Catholic schools don't have the benefit of receiving local, state, and federal funding. What do you want them to do.

BTW, why don't you just come right out and make a molestor joke? Why be coy about it like you're being here?

10 posted on 09/02/2002 8:32:14 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scannell
Also, you got to wonder if privitation and vouchers are best utilized in the direction of an instution that has NOW become synomous with sanctimonious CHILD ABUSE.

BTW, my friend, do you realize that the majority of Catholic school teachers are laity? Oh yeah, that's right, it would take the oomph out of your veiled insults to the Church. SIlly me.
11 posted on 09/02/2002 8:33:22 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I wish I could agree with you. But I believe he has a history of strong arming many of those with legitmate gripes concerning abuse by priests. That does not square with being a good man. Further, he wrote the current archdiocesan guidelines for the formation of Catholics in regard to the catechism. It is progressive to the point of including sex ed and discussion of masterbation for seventh and eight graders, which is in opposition to the Propogation of the Faith's letter to families urging that they and they alone teach these matters to their children, whether or not the diocesan catechetical outline says it should be taught or not. Egan says it should be taught. V's wife.
12 posted on 09/02/2002 8:33:47 AM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
The problem with the rampant child molestation throught the USA Catholic Church and empowered by the leadership and currently hunkered down in a bunker "defensive" mentality is that it is not a joke. After all without repentance there is no remission of sin.
13 posted on 09/02/2002 8:34:28 AM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
Here is an article illustrating Cardinal O'Connors feelings regarding Clinton.

Cardinal's Dying Wish: Keep Clinton Out of St. Patrick's

NewsMax.com Monday, May 8, 2000

As Cardinal O'Connor battled brain cancer and faced death during the past eight months, he remained steadfast in his distaste of Bill Clinton.

A source close to the Cardinal tells NewsMax.com that O'Connor had a long-standing order to keep Bill Clinton out of St. Patrick's Cathedral – no matter how important the occasion.

Last week the White House announced that both Bill and Hillary Clinton would be attending the Cardinal's funeral mass at St. Patrick's, set for Monday afternoon.

"O'Connor would have gone berserk if he knew Clinton was coming," the source said.

O'Connor was said to be extremely hostile to Clinton, a man who annoyed him on several levels. O'Connor had been a veteran, a Navy Admiral who had served in the military and in the front lines of Vietnam.

Clinton's draft avoidance record didn't sit well with the Cardinal, nor did Clinton's corruption.

O'Connor was also annoyed with Clinton's strong advocacy of partial birth abortion – a procedure O'Connor likened to infanticide.

O'Connor's animus toward the president erupted after the crash of TWA Flight 800 in 1996.

In the days after the tragedy, Mayor Giuliani had organized a memorial service for the victims' families at JFK Airport.

Cardinal O'Connor was set to officiate, until he found out Clinton planned on attending. "If Clinton is coming, you can count me out," O'Connor's office bluntly told the mayor's office.

Clinton was quickly disinvited.

A month or so after the crash, O'Connor hosted his own memorial mass at St. Patrick's for the victims. Clinton was in New York that weekend for a birthday party and the White House called the Archdiocese and asked if he could attend.

The answer from the Cardinal's Office was blunt: Bill Clinton is not welcome at St. Patrick's.

14 posted on 09/02/2002 8:35:36 AM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ventana
Oh,and he has a section in there on homosexuality. And, one of the allowed texts is "Growing In Love," a revolting book authored by a revolting priest. V's wife.
15 posted on 09/02/2002 8:36:23 AM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
BTW, my friend, do you realize that the majority of Catholic school teachers are laity?

Yes I do and I realize that the "majority" of Catholic Priests are not Pedophiles, but that dosen't alter the risk calculation with them most innocent group amoung us.

16 posted on 09/02/2002 8:36:43 AM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: scannell
I am now coming to the conclusion that any Bishop or Cardinal who allows sex education in his diocese to be mandated, who also permits a catechism which avoids heavy emphasis on the Virtues and original sin and our fallen nature, is not about the business of the formation of true Catholics, but is hastening the collapse of true Catholicism. Harsh, yes, I suppose so. V's wife.
17 posted on 09/02/2002 8:40:08 AM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: scannell
I just think that anyone trying to make some connection between being pro-vouchers and looking to import fresh meat is just taking potshots. Child molestation (more like teenager seduction and initiation by homosexuals) does not have to pop up on every thread about Catholics does it?
18 posted on 09/02/2002 8:46:45 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Conservative til I die
I just think that anyone trying to make some connection between being pro-vouchers and looking to import fresh meat is just taking potshots.

"The pedos are just looking for some fresh meat to molest! I bet they only want educational reform for boys age 5-12!" Post #9 by Conservative for Life.

Sorry Charlie, but the fresh meat refrence was yours not mine.

19 posted on 09/02/2002 8:50:22 AM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: scannell
Read the whole post. I don't think I typed it in an invisible font. ::rolls eyes::
20 posted on 09/02/2002 8:51:50 AM PDT by Conservative til I die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson