Posted on 09/02/2002 10:14:59 AM PDT by mikeb704
When I turned 50 five years ago, I took a buyout from my employer. It didnt seem too bad a deal: $25,000 (minus taxes, of course) and a slightly reduced pension effective immediately. After decades of driving to the Loop each workday, I was ready for a break.
So I took a three-year hiatus. Caught up on a great deal of reading. Spent lots of time cruising down the information highway. Hung out with other guys whod taken a powder from the rat race. Watched lots of cable news shows. This was about the time Billy Liar, whod turned the White House into a veritable cesspool, was cranking out more Whoppers a week than Burger King.
Then something remarkable happened. Doing nothing became dare I say it? - boring. This realization came one day when, after waking up at about 11:00 AM, I become conscious of the fact that whether or not I got dressed didnt really make too much of a difference. Trust me, walking around in ones underwear all day isnt that good a look. For some of us, anyway.
So I went and got a part-time job at a small, family-owned company. It didnt pay much, but that was OK. I had learned to live in genteel poverty with my pension and, aside from needing a new computer every month or two and an apple pie or chocolate cake every day or two, lived a minimalist existence.
The jobs hours were short and flexible. Going to work was a 10-minute drive. The boss tolerated my, ah, er, idiosyncrasies. I had found a reason to get dressed, at least some days.
In July I was terminated. The word "nepotism" derives from a Latin word meaning nephew. In my case, a family nephew actually was hired to do some of the things Id been doing. I understand this and hold no ill feelings. As the late Richard Daley said, "How are you supposed to be able to do favors for other peoples kids if you cant do any for your own?"
Looking for a new job has been an education. Everyone knows that theres not an abundance of employment opportunities right now. For many of the ones that are available, learning to ask, "Would you like to super size that for 59 cents?" is an essential component of the training program. Im not too nimble on greasy floors, so Ive tried to avoid those.
The jobs Ive managed to be interviewed for, though, are beginning to make the Golden Arches look better all the time. Please dont pass any more laws on my account, but it does seem to me age discrimination is a genuine possibility. When interviews end with the 35-year old saying, "Sir, thank you for coming in. Sir." you have to wonder if age isnt something of a factor.
One interviewer noted my alleged "wealth of experience." The first time she said that, I didnt think much about it. Four times in 15 minutes later, that wealth of experience comment suspiciously began sounding like code words for, "Man, you are such a geezer."
At one company I interviewed with five, count em, five, different people. One person asked what the three biggest accomplishments Id had in a position I left 26 years ago. I thought I was doing well by remembering Id had the darn job at all.
Another asked what "cultural qualities" I could offer an employer. I was going to give the old trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent routine, but instead mumbled something about being dependable. It didnt matter as she wasnt listening anyway, but focusing on the next question on her script.
At one place, the interviewer asked where I wanted to be in my career in 15 years. Heck, Ill be happy to be just breathing in 15 years. I wanted to scream at him that I AM NOT LOOKING FOR A CAREER. Already had one of those. Just looking for a job. Instead I mumbled something about being dependable. It didnt matter as he wasnt listening anyway, but focusing on the next question on his script.
Several interviewers asked touchy-feely questions like do you have an undiluted commitment to customer satisfaction and what truly motivates most people. I kept waiting for someone to ask if I were a tree, what kind would I be.
Many of us unemployed use the Internet for job searches. A definite advantage is most listings there have nothing to do with fast-food joints. No siree Bob. The Internet offers real job opportunities. You know, stuff like how you can make $4,000 a day stuffing envelopes at home. I just sent in my $25 to get info on how to do that, and can hardly wait to start.
In the meantime, Ill keep on looking. If you see any ads for an employer who needs an indolent old guy with a bad attitude, please let me know.
She gets to do what she loves (shop) and she only works her own hours. That's decent money for working part-time in low-cost Alabama.
Another acqaintence of mine offers photographic touch-up services. He's got a web page and occassionaly takes out an ad in a Green Sheet or small local paper when he wants extra business, and mostly he gets people with faded old photographs or pictures of babies with "red eyes" that he scans in to PhotoShop and digitally touches up. He makes decent money, works from home, and didn't have to interview with anyone younger than himself.
What you are witnessing in your job search is that it is becoming increasingly harder to get a steady paycheck from an employer (especially when said employer would have to put up with your admitted idiosyncracies, per above).
But why do you want a paycheck? Wouldn't checks for your goods via eBay/Paypal suffice? Wouldn't checks for your photographic touch-up services be good enough? Wouldn't you rather work at home, anyway?
You already said that you like to surf the Net and keep your own hours, so go forth and do what you enjoy.
I hate job hunting but my employer has me down to 20 hours every other week and I'm getting desperate though I'm not quite ready for "Do you want fries with that?"
That is, I tend to favor older applicants over younger applicants. Over the years, the "older" employees have consistently worked out better. They are more dependable, more hard working, easier to get along with, and tend to be "low-maintenance" employees that can be depended upon to do their jobs well. As well, they usually have excellent customer relations.
Younger applicants, especially those new to the workforce, are oftentimes "high-maintenance" employees. They tend to complain, complain, complain. They must constantly be supervised. They tend to call in sick or arrive late much more frequently then their older counterparts. They often have an "attitude" and generate the most customer complains for rudeness. They are rarely happy employees and often they seed discontent with the other workers.
Generally speaking of course. There are exceptions to the rule. I have developed some excellent young employees over the years and as well, I have hired in some older people who just didn't work out.
But if I have two applicants and one is older (40ish) and the other is younger (20ish), I will tend to go with the older one most of the time.
Anyway, please forgive me for practicing age discrimination. And please don't report me to the authorities. Happy Labor Day!
Job-hunting is the worst. Right now it isnt even easy for us young ones with collage degrees in business and excellent references. It took me three months to find a job at both a lower position and lower wage then the job I was downsized from. Of course I was looking for a career not just a job ;^)
If you just want a job you should try a Temporary Agency. You get to meet new and interesting people whos lungs you would like to rip out for wages that McDonald's would scorn to offer but it is not boring.
In fact the constant change can be kind of fun. And there is always the chance that you will find someplace that likes you enough to offer a permanent job and you will like them enough to accept.
a.cricket
Maybe it depends on the job but I think age discrimination tends to be in that direction in many cases. Older can be better because for one you can check more references and the job history is better.
I think that a lot of businesses have checklists that they use for hiring new employees. Your qualifications and interview are secondary considerations.
I quit my "career" on June 1, after 35 years of fighting the Los Angeles freeways (etc., etc., etc.) and moved wifey and self to what had been our weekend home out here in the south eastern Kalifornia desert. We did fine on the sale of the L.A. area home, so there is no immediate pressure.
All this said, I've begun dipping my foot into the job search waters, and have my first real "interview" tomorrow. I'm 55; will report back here if I pick up any "code" for 'age discrimination'!
I got my current job by doing a brute-force, white-pages telephone search. In other words, I went through the white pages (that way I knew I'd hit every possible number because small companies don't have to pay to be listed there) and called every company that looked like it might have anything to do with technology.
I made 165 calls before I got hired; that was 13 years ago.
And I own the company now.
(steely)
The Authorities shouldn't be a problem ... but if you work for a large corporation, you might want to be aware of the corporation's preferences - usually the younger, the better. Youngsters might be "high maintenance" but that would be someone else's problem - they work cheap, and they lower the "average employee age" which is important to the health insurance carriers.
But I certainly applaud your efforts, Sam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.