1 posted on
09/03/2002 10:05:29 AM PDT by
Blackyce
To: Blackyce
Yet their initial stages of development relied on practices that would not today be considered environmental-friendly, Why did the West progress past these practices while you third-worlders are still stuck using medieval methods??
To: Blackyce
Looks like at least ONE African has a serious clue and his head screwed on straight. . . but his voice is being drowned out by all the shakedown artists
5 posted on
09/03/2002 10:34:11 AM PDT by
Salgak
To: Blackyce
National Guard Officers??
6 posted on
09/03/2002 10:39:22 AM PDT by
stuartcr
To: Blackyce
This is priceless. Some of the most dedicated and driven entrepreneurs I have ever met were the farmers and rural merchants in the Newly Industrialising Countries I've been in.
In the film "Out Of Africa" the Redford character has the typical, utopian, holier-than-thou attitude regarding the locals. He expounds on his desire to see them remain illiterate and steeped solely in their verbal storytelling culture. The Streep character believes this is hogwash, and realises that in order to do well in the world, the locals must learn to deal with the world on modern terms. I'm glad that the latter won our over the former.
To: Blackyce
BUMP
To: Blackyce
NGO? Hmmm. . . looks like it's the abbreviated "N" word !!! ;-))
To: Blackyce
This piece in right on the money, economically speaking, but he did leave out one of the nastier
social aspects of "sustainable development".
The global governance crowd want to keep primitive people primitive as if they were animals in a nature preserve. With the exception of a few hunter-gatherers here and there, primitive just means extremely poor.
14 posted on
09/03/2002 1:21:50 PM PDT by
Salman
To: Blackyce
15 posted on
09/03/2002 4:04:07 PM PDT by
USA21
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson