Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DUMBGRUNT
Just how is it that you can get WNV but not AIDS, from a bug?

Not to nitpick, but you would get HIV not AIDS from the mosquito. Anyway, WNV and HIV are two different types of viruses, you can think of them as being analogous to two different species. HIV doesn't do well outside of the body, nor does it do well in the body of a mosquito. Most of your mosquito born viruses have evolved a rather interesting relationship with the mosquito that allows for their transmission from host to host (if you'd like more info on this, and it's fasciniating, I'll dig it up for you). HIV doesn't need this - humans seem to manage to have enough sex and shoot up enough drugs to pass the virus along just fine.

From the CDC:
"If HIV were being transmitted through other routes (such as through air, water, or insects), the pattern of reported AIDS cases would be much different from what has been observed. For example, if mosquitoes could transmit HIV infection, many more young children and preadolescents would have been diagnosed with AIDS."

14 posted on 09/04/2002 6:34:29 PM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: realpatriot71

"For example, if mosquitoes could transmit HIV infection, many more young children and preadolescents would have been diagnosed with AIDS."

Thank you for taking the time to answer, this is something I have been wondering about.
15 posted on 09/04/2002 7:00:46 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot71
From CDC link:
Insects

From the onset of the HIV epidemic, there has been concern about transmission of the virus by biting and bloodsucking insects. However, studies conducted by researchers at CDC and elsewhere have shown no evidence of HIV transmission through insects--even in areas where there are many cases of AIDS and large populations of insects such as mosquitoes. Lack of such outbreaks, despite intense efforts to detect them, supports the conclusion that HIV is not transmitted by insects.

The results of experiments and observations of insect biting behavior indicate that when an insect bites a person, it does not inject its own or a previously bitten person’s or animal’s blood into the next person bitten. Rather, it injects saliva, which acts as a lubricant or anticoagulant so the insect can feed efficiently. Such diseases as yellow fever and malaria are transmitted through the saliva of specific species of mosquitoes. However, HIV lives for only a short time inside an insect and, unlike organisms that are transmitted via insect bites, HIV does not reproduce (and does not survive) in insects. Thus, even if the virus enters a mosquito or another sucking or biting insect, the insect does not become infected and cannot transmit HIV to the next human it feeds on or bites. HIV is not found in insect feces.

There is also no reason to fear that a biting or bloodsucking insect, such as a mosquito, could transmit HIV from one person to another through HIV-infected blood left on its mouth parts. Two factors serve to explain why this is so--first, infected people do not have constant, high levels of HIV in their bloodstreams and, second, insect mouth parts do not retain large amounts of blood on their surfaces. Further, scientists who study insects have determined that biting insects normally do not travel from one person to the next immediately after ingesting blood. Rather, they fly to a resting place to digest this blood meal.

16 posted on 09/04/2002 7:07:18 PM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson