Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freedom devalued Poll shows that many Americans no longer cherish their rights
Spartanburg Herald-Journal ^ | Sept. 4 ,2002

Posted on 09/04/2002 2:21:46 PM PDT by Captain Shady

Freedom devalued Poll shows that many Americans no longer cherish their rights

Congress resumed its discussions in Washington this week on a host of important issues: homeland security, whether the United States should invade Iraq, budget priorities, health care and boosting the economy.

But none of those issues and no foreign enemy poses a greater danger to this country and the way of life we have enjoyed than the attitudes expressed in a poll released last week.

The poll shows that half of Americans think that the First Amendment goes too far in guaranteeing the rights it protects.

That number has more than doubled in the past two years. Researchers have tied the change to security concerns surrounding the war on terrorism and the way the media covered the 2000 presidential election.

The annual poll is done by the Center for Survey Research & Analysis at the University of Connecticut for the Freedom Forum First Amendment Center.

Researchers found that:

“More than four in 10 said they would limit the academic freedom of professors and bar criticism of government military policy.”

“About half of those surveyed said government should be able to monitor religious groups in the interest of national security, even if that means infringing upon religious freedom.”

“Forty-two percent of respondents said the press in America has too much freedom to do what it wants.”

Are Americans willing to trade freedom for security, even the most cherished freedoms of the First Amendment?

They will be if they see these freedoms as applying only to others. And they will if they think the restrictions they favor will only apply to others.

We must remember that the First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights, protects our freedoms — yours personally.

There is no way to impinge on someone else’s religious freedom without giving up your own. There is no way to limit someone else’s ability to speak his mind without giving up your ability to sound off. There is no way to restrict the news media without giving up your right to know what’s happening.

The First Amendment and other constitutional protections are not just for others. They protect us. Their provisions and our forefathers’ willingness to fight for their preservation have made this country the beacon for freedom that it is.

We cannot now allow complacency and fear to convince us to part with those cherished values that are hated by much of the world and envied by the rest.

Americans are planning to commemorate Sept. 11. We should take the advice of Charles Haynes of the First Amendment Center and make Sept. 11 an annual “Day of Freedom,” a celebration of the uniquely American values that the terrorists attacked.

Haynes reminds us of Abraham Lincoln’s words at Gettysburg: “We here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

What better way to commemorate an attack on freedom than by committing to preserve and celebrate that freedom.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Philosophy; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: freedom; responsibility
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Kevin Curry
he pretty much had libertarian family values nailed down cold.


You cannot be a statist and a libertarian.

You can be a statist and be a republican (e.g. kevin curry) or a democrat (e.g. clinton).

Regards

J.R.
41 posted on 09/04/2002 9:08:06 PM PDT by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady
Center for Survey Research & Analysis at the University of Connecticut for the Freedom Forum First Amendment Center

Looks like they spent more money on the organization name than an accurate poll.

42 posted on 09/04/2002 9:27:35 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady; NMC EXP; tpaine
reminds us of Abraham Lincoln’s words



"Our reliance against tyranny is in the love of liberty which God has planted in us. Our defense is in the spirit which prized liberty as the heritage of all men, in all lands everywhere. Destroy this spirit and you have planted the seeds of despotism at your own doors.Familiarize yourself with the chains of bondage and you prepare your own limbs to wear them.Accustomed to trample on the rights of others, you have lost the genius of your own independence and become the fit subjects of the first cunning tyrant who rises among you."

Abraham Lincoln, speech during campaign against Stephen A. Douglas
for seat in U.S. Senate, September 1858

43 posted on 09/04/2002 10:34:57 PM PDT by hammerdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry; OWK
Your posts may be flaccid and puerile, but I must applaud you on this one thing: you have toughed it out here. You are quite unlike that girly-man OWK who talks tough but pouts and slinks away if everyone doesn't agree with him. I admire your persistence, tpaine.
_________________________________

Once again kevin, -- your reply is a form of confession, my son.

I'm 'flaccid', OWK's a girly-man.. How weird, - & telling.
Now, I hope you don't pout about this too much, -- but I spit on your 'admiration'. Go suck up to someone who cares what you think.

44 posted on 09/04/2002 11:18:21 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Captain Shady
“About half of those surveyed said government should be able to monitor religious groups in the interest of national security, even if that means infringing upon religious freedom.”

And they should. Quite a high percentage of mosques double as terrorist fund raising centers.

45 posted on 09/04/2002 11:24:27 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Clinton "almost a libertarian?" Hardly. All he'd have to do is change is position on the WOD, taxes, foreign aid, health care, education, social security, etc., etc.

I know libertarians, Bill, and you're no libertarian.

46 posted on 09/04/2002 11:27:59 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
Lincoln certainly was right about that. A few others have commented as well:

“The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground.”
-- Thomas Jefferson

“I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”
-- James Madison

“The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedience, and by parts.”
-- Edmund Burke

"There is none more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free!"
-- Johann W. von Goethe

Regards

J.R.
47 posted on 09/05/2002 5:15:48 AM PDT by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Your posts may be flaccid and puerile, but I must applaud you on this one thing: you have toughed it out here. You are quite unlike that girly-man OWK who talks tough but pouts and slinks away if everyone doesn't agree with him. I admire your persistence, tpaine.

If you're going to take a poke at me.. be man enough to address it to me.

48 posted on 09/05/2002 5:46:16 AM PDT by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NMC EXP
Thanks, J.R.
It's a sad day when so many have lost sight.

Regards.

"I tell you true, liberty is the best of all things;
never live beneath the noose of a servile halter."

--William Wallace

49 posted on 09/05/2002 6:05:05 AM PDT by hammerdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Now you don't always disagree with me now do you?
50 posted on 09/05/2002 7:52:31 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NMC EXP
A republic is a form of State. Thus, a republican would have to be a statist wouldn't he?
51 posted on 09/05/2002 8:42:57 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson