Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Disconnect Between Hollywood and America
Capitalist Chicks DOT COM ^ | FR Post 9-5-2 | Written by Pat Sajaak

Posted on 09/05/2002 12:39:01 PM PDT by vannrox

The Disconnect Between Hollywood and America

Reprinted by permission from IMPRIMIS, the national speech digest of Hillsdale College (www.hillsdale.edu).
Written by Pat Sajaak

Here in this quiet, peaceful corner of Michigan, you might not have a sense of your importance in the world. I come from a community that has the opposite problem. Because it is so big and so powerful, so great and so well-known, it has an exaggerated view of its significance. That community is Hollywood. Not Hollywood, the town. Not much Show Business actually goes on there. Most of the studios are spread around other Southern California communities, like Culver City or Burbank. But I mean Hollywood, the Entertainment Mecca -- which includes parts of Southern California and New York City, and, because news has become entertainment, some of Washington, D.C., as well.

While I work in Hollywood, I live elsewhere. My family and I live in a quiet suburb of Annapolis, Maryland. The kids go to school there. They live near their grandparents -- my in-laws -- and most of my neighbors care very little about overnight ratings, box office grosses and sweeps weeks. We don't hate L.A. In fact, we like it, and we spend a great deal of time there. But I happen to have a job that allows me a great deal of flexibility, and that gives me the luxury of living a real life in addition to my fake one.

You see, one of the dangers of my business is that it has the potential to fill you with a distorted view of life and of your importance in it. And it's understandable in a way. If you are part of a successful enterprise, people treat you very well. They send limos for you. They tiptoe around you. They pretend that the most outlandish or inane things you might say are important and quotable. Drugs? Adultery? Alcoholism? Deviant behavior? Don't worry. You go on Oprah-you cry-people call you heroic for being so open-and your career soars to new heights.

You're treated importantly, so you must be important. Suddenly your views are not just your own private opinions; they become part of the public record. They quote you on Entertainment Tonight and in People magazine. You can endorse a candidate, fight for a cause, call people names -- it's pretty heady stuff. The world waits breathlessly for your next pronouncement.

Rosie O'Donnell -- a daytime talk show host -- goes public with her sexual preference, and she is lauded as brave. What exactly is brave about that? First of all, who cares? And what's brave about getting the chance to be interviewed by ABC and landing on magazine covers? I characterize it as bravery-as-a-career-move.

I don't mean to pick on Ms. O'Donnell, but it's just another example of the self-importance that Show Business can bestow on you -- the idea that your sexual preference matters to anyone other than your immediate family and your partner, or partners, seems rather silly to me.

Speaking of silly, Alec Baldwin, an actor, recently compared the election of George W. Bush to the terrorist attacks of last September. This is the same Baldwin brother who promised to leave the country if Bush were elected. Sadly, he reneged on that one. Baldwin also went on Conan O'Brien's late-night show during the Clinton impeachment to say that Illinois Republican Congressman Henry Hyde should be shot -- along with his family.

Do remarks like that get you chastised in Hollywood? Ostracized? Marginalized? No, it's Alec Baldwin. He's an actor. He's in Show Business. He's important.

The silliness and outrageousness that emanates from Hollywood comes from non-performers as well. Ted Turner once mocked his employees who had ashes on their foreheads for Ash Wednesday as "Jesus Freaks." Mr. Turner, a self-proclaimed protector of human rights, apparently has his limits.

Filmmaker Rob Reiner -- a cofounder of Castle Rock Entertainment -- is reportedly upset by what he sees in many films these days, and he plans to do something about it. In fact, he's so upset about this thing, anyone who wants to depict it in a Castle Rock film must meet with Reiner first in order to justify its inclusion.

So what's got Rob so upset? Gratuitous violence? Casual sex? Disrespect toward Christianity? Bias against Big Business? Is that what he wants to cut down or eliminate? No, of course not. That would be censorship. He wants to get rid of smoking. There's too much smoking in movies.

To quote Mr. Reiner, "Movies are basically advertising cigarettes to kids." No knock on Rob. In fact, I agree with him. But why is smoking open to censorship and not these other issues? And what happened to Hollywood's argument that movies and TV shows don't cause bad behavior, they just reflect it? Or is it merely a health issue? But surely, health is involved when it comes to violence and casual sex. The answer is, there is no answer. It's just Hollywood being Hollywood. It's monumental hypocrisy. Kids can't pick up bad habits from what they watch... oh, except for smoking.

You see, if you complain about what you see as excesses on the screen, you are a book-burning prude who wants to tell everyone else how to live. You are a censor. You have no right. That is a right saved for the wise. They know better. They are important.

It's the same kind of nonsense that brings celebrities to "Save the Earth" benefits in eight-mile-per-gallon limos. Or that allows them to make a public service announcement urging recycling -- filmed at their 20,000 square foot homes. They can lecture to you and you should listen, even if they don't, because... well, because they're celebrities. They're from Hollywood, for goodness sake-and you live in Michigan!

next page

Contact Us


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: change; democrat; difference; differences; disconnect; dnc; hollywood; liberal; nation; peace; people; republican; rnc; war
I found this to be a good read. But, I've known it all along. It is refreshing to read.
1 posted on 09/05/2002 12:39:03 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
My respect for Mr. Pat Sajaak jumped several hundred fold.
3 posted on 09/05/2002 1:10:32 PM PDT by Budge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Budge
OK. I've seen two spellings of the last name. One is the same as the Wheel of Fortune host and one is not. Is this actually from the host of Wheel of Fortune or a separate individual all-together? If it is from said host, good for him. I've often thought him to be fairly sincere and down to earth. Not sure about Vanna.
4 posted on 09/05/2002 1:17:38 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
Sajak is very conservative this is consistent with his views.
5 posted on 09/05/2002 1:23:41 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
I have no idea if this is the host of "Wheel Of Fortune" or not, but I suspect it is because of his reference to his work there and elsewhere.

At least, I hope it is one and the same.

6 posted on 09/05/2002 1:29:53 PM PDT by Budge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
No doubt that Hollywood and its elite inner circle of snotty actors and directors is far removed from Middle America.
HOWEVER,there is a funny inconsistency here and that is the flocking of millions of these same Americans to the theatres every yeat to devour this trifling and meaningless tripe!America has a love-hate relationship with Hollywood.
7 posted on 09/05/2002 1:38:55 PM PDT by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Actually Balwin said that Hyde and his family should be stoned to death.


Sakak is right for the most part, I do make a distinction though. I admire those stars that use their status and energies to make a difference. Like a Mary Tyler Moore on the left, a Heston on the right.

They have the power to change things for the better, why not let them use it.

8 posted on 09/05/2002 1:46:32 PM PDT by catonsville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Yeah, it is true and a little cathartic to read things we have always thought.

Frankly I am kind of getting sick of these types of articles though. All they really amount to is bitching. That is all the conservatives do is bitch about how the left has taken over this, and taken over that.

What are we doing to take these institutions back. It stands that if the left can hijack our entertainment, education, and news media institutions, then those same institutions can be re-hijacked.

To me anything else is just alot of conservative whining

9 posted on 09/05/2002 2:15:48 PM PDT by Check_Your_Premises
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Rob Reiner is a pompous, obnoxious whale! That's why he is so sensitive to second hand smoke ... it irritates his blow-hole!
10 posted on 09/05/2002 4:48:43 PM PDT by layman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610
Very well stated (# 7) and very much a propos. There is now a thread going on this conservative forum about the "most shamelessly politically correct movie you have seen" where we're all naming some of the worst Hollywood trash that we conservatives have seen. I asked why (we were seeing it) a while ago, but no answers came.
11 posted on 09/05/2002 4:56:54 PM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: layman
Fantasy has become reality. Rob Reiner is a meathead!
12 posted on 09/05/2002 4:57:03 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Budge
This is the real Pat Sajak. On the Hillsdale/Imprimis website the spelling is "Sajak" and there is a photo of him addressing the students. The Capitalist Chicks website reprinted the Imprimis article and spelled his name "Sajaak."
13 posted on 09/05/2002 5:04:24 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
This may sound a little strange but one of the best movies that savaged the liberal establishment was Bullworth!Yes,Yes,I know Beatty came from the Far Left with this movie but it was a right on satire of the Clinton-Gore-Boxer limo liberals who go slumming for votes at black churches but really have nothing but contempt for the subjects of their pandering.
I think the real problem with modern media is the dumbing down to the lowest common denominator.Back in 1977,Fred Silverman of ABC made his famous statement that network TV was tailored to a "seventh grade mentality".
Another peeve of mine are these shows about"rebel"priests who get into trouble challenging orthodox dogma.A REAL daring show would be about a priest who was an avid DEFENDER of traditional Catholic values and went against the humanist liberal segment of the faith.THAT I would love to see.
14 posted on 09/05/2002 6:21:44 PM PDT by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610
In a way, all films which seek to comfort the audience are politically correct, which is true today more than ever before, as multiple plot twists are filmed and then tested for approval in front of guinea pig audiences before the final cut is made. It didn't used to be that way, but then, cinema as art is dying, giving way to synthetic products no different from musical "products" or from toothpaste and toilet paper.

But no studio in this country will finance a movie today that attempts to challenge in a major way what we refer to as conventional wisdom. In the old days of Hollywood, there were genres and subgenres that could do that and find audiences, even if they seldom produced blockbusters. Well, there are actually some independent films occasionally that try.

15 posted on 09/05/2002 9:09:29 PM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Pat Sajak is proof that not all Poles are as dumb as "Meathead."
16 posted on 09/05/2002 9:17:48 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"Pat Sajak is proof that not all Poles are as dumb as Meathead." LOL! What a funny first post of the morn' to read!
17 posted on 09/06/2002 8:55:12 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson