Replies

limbaugs schtick has worn thin with me. he is merely a pary hack. he will bitch and moan that the rnc wont fight for what they are SUPPOSED to stand for..calling them spineless.

but then he keeps shilling for them, as they give away our freedoms and income to the statist machine.

now, after it is too late, limbaugh thinks there may be something afoot (security wise) after being hit in the face with all kinds of evidence for a hell of a long time.

he amounts to nothing more than a useful idiot.

he is a second hander of esteem in the nth degree. his constant name dropping is apparently designed to improve his esteem...much like a society belle from the upper east side.

never was impressed by that crap. I like real people, who are confident enough to not have to point out where they were or who they were with in order to feel good about themselves. I think half the time he is trying to impress himself as much as anyone else.

bill klinton knows and meets lots of self important people too. bfd.

Jeez, I thought I was the only person who thought like that. I couldn't have said it better myself. I gave up on that wind-bag about a year ago. He must get paid quite a bit by the 'pubs to blather on and on in what amounts to a Republican add posing as a radio show.

Wait a minute. Back in the 'honeymoon days' following 9/11, when NO ONE in the media would criticise Mr. Bush, Rush was constantly criticising the Bush administration for the Education Bill, the Campaign Finance Reform Bill, the Farm Bill, and for ignoring the Constitutional Rights of US citizens. He hasn't stopped. Now the Democrats are back to attacking Bush for anything and everything. Amidst the din of mindless mud-slinging it might sound as though Rush is shilling for the GOP.

There is more original thought on Rush's show than anywhere in the media, either printed or broadcast. The man ad-libs for three hours a day and is still the most prepared broadcaster around.

I have no clue what your post has to do with the interview with Gertz. He has written an expose' of what led to the breakdown of our intelligence that helped to allow 911. It has nothing to do with Rush, other than that he interviewed him, and I am grateful that I was able to hear it.
President Bush is doing all he can to protect our lives, which is exactly what he should be doing. I haven't lost one freedom that I have noticed since 911. Those were lost way before he came into office.

I am equally perplexed as to the meaning of your statement about Clinton knowing a lot of important people. Did you read the thread, or did you just see Rush's name and go off?

You are being more than a little too harsh. Limbaugh follows the WSJ editorial page 80% of the time. He is Joe Sixpack's guide to the WSJ editorial page. So kicking him for following Micah Morrison's column that, finally, mainstreams a lot of the views Freepers have developed, is not really fair. He is on that part of the news flow and we are on the leading edge, and that is just the way it is.

Geez... yea you're right. I liked Limbaugh but you opened my eyes.

He couldn't shine Clintons shoes. What an idiot!

Excuse me... my doctor's here with my prozac. ;^[]