To: null and void
Nothing in the article about ALF, or did I miss it? You are correct. It was not mentioned in this article. However, the talk on the street is that an "event" was expected. The question now is whether they will officially take credit, seeing as how they managed to kill so many of the animals they claim to be saving.
To: Jolly Rodgers
Alf? I thought they took that SOB off the air in the late 80's!!!
7 posted on
09/05/2002 10:30:23 PM PDT by
Jon Geb
To: Jolly Rodgers
Wellll, they did save them from a fate worse than death - being owned as pets by humans...
To: Jolly Rodgers
Their 'Tricky ALF' syndrome is surfacing. They had to kill the animals to save them.
To: Jolly Rodgers
You are correct. It was not mentioned in this article. However, the talk on the street is that an "event" was expected....Doughuts to dollars says you are right, right, right. Because: 1)The speed at which the fire spread, and 2) The fact that the fellow had no insurance, thus no motive to set the fire.
To: Jolly Rodgers
PETA tends to be ALF's Sinn Fein.
I doubt ALF will take credit for this one.
14 posted on
09/06/2002 7:30:59 AM PDT by
hchutch
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson