Democrats for Regime Change *[Article Rush is talking about today]*

The Weekly Standard ^ | ADVANCE COPY from the September 16, 2002 issue | Stephen F. Hayes

[maica]

bump for truth

[maryz]

I wonder if Bush can get Daschle, et al. on videotape from the Clinton years -- and show them compared to Daschle, et al. today. Too bad Rush doesn't still have his TV show -- this was just the kind of thing he would have done beautifully.

[The Vast Right Wing]

Bump for exposing hypocrisy!!

[breakem]

I am a sometime critic of Rush, but he has hit a grand slam today and this is the latest in a string of excellent presentations.

[bert]

I thought Rush was going to say that Dashole favors a change in the American Regime and the elimination of President Bush more than the Iraqi regime and the disposition od Saddam Husein.

I'm certain that's the case.

[rushfreedom]

Other good quotes from 1998

The U.N. Security Council welcomes Iraq's promise to to cooperate with U.N. inspectors, but U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan warns that in a future crisis, military force might be the only way out.
- The Associated Press, Latest developments in Iraqi crisis. , AP Online, 11-16-1998.


``This is not over until absolute and unconditional compliance is guaranteed and delivered,'' said Blair, speaking outside his Downing Street office.

Blair said there would no hesitation to strike, if Iraq does not deliver on its pledge.

``There will be no warning whatsoever,'' said Blair.
- KEVIN GALVIN Associated Press Writer, Clinton says Iraq must live up to its pledge. , AP Online, 11-15-1998.

I can not believe I forgot all this. What happen after all this? Did inspectors go back in?

[McGruff]

Rush is slamming Dashole today on this topic. I thought it was his original research, but now I see where he got it.

Thanks for posting this, a definite bookmark.

[Hugin]

"What has changed in recent months or years" to justify confronting Saddam, Daschle asked last Wednesday after meeting with President Bush. Dick Gephardt wants to know what a democratic Iraq would look like. Dianne Feinstein wants the Israeli-Palestinian conflict settled first. Bob Graham says the administration hasn't presented anything new. John Kerry complains about, well, everything.

All attempts to stall a vote until after the election. Dems will lose votes either way they come down on Iraq. If they support the president, their base will be alienated. If they oppose it they will lose moderate Dems and independents. So it's stall, stall, stall.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

1998 BUMP!

[LongsforReagan]

This needs to go mainstream.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Daschle has been set up again and has once again taken the bait faster than a large mouth bass jumps on a spring lizard.

Dass says there is no new info. Low and behold come the leaks indicating that SH has new delivery system, etc, etc. The WH knew that Dass would be unmoved, let him shoot off his mouth and then allows the info to make it to the public. When the rest of the story is revealed by President Bush, Daschle will have sealed the fate of the Democrat Party in at least the next election if not longer.

[Matchett-PI]

BTTT!! Not only is Rush talking about this article, he used the words, "criminal activity" in the context of talking about, "what has changed???" since 1998 (and before) when we didn't see any of the RINOS (from the Bush #1 Administration) objecting like they are now.

In 1998 Clinton asked for an assault against Iraq. Joining him were the usual DemocRAT suspects Daschle, Gephardt, etal, including RINOS like REPUBLICAN Chuck Hagle. None of them objected or asked for proof --- like they are now???

WHY are they objecting now especially when things have gotten even worse???

The only thing that has changed is that now they know we have someone in the WH who walks the walk and will do what he says he will.

Have these DemocRATS and Rinos been involved in taking money from middle-east types to look the other way when the terrorists have attacked us for decades all over the world??? What are they covering up? I want to know.

[Doug Loss]

the broad 1998 resolution: Congress "urges the president to take all necessary and appropriate actions to respond to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."

Do these things expire? If not, this is an iron-clad permission for us to take Iraq out. No more debate needed! No interpretation of the war on terrorism resolution needed! Of course the Democrats will say that this only applied to their president, not to any old president.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

...This needs to go mainstream...

It does, but it won't.

[facedown]

El Rushbo bump.

[Grampa Dave]

Great article. I have bookmarked it.

Whenever one of these whining weasels rats tries to defend Saddamm, we need to send them a copy of this oped.

[ladtx]

...This needs to go mainstream...

It does, but it won't.

FOX will probably pick it up.

[Grampa Dave]

I believe that you answered your own questions with this paragraph/question you posted re the apparent changes in behavior of the rats:

Have these DemocRATS and Rinos been involved in taking money from middle-east types to look the other way when the terrorists have attacked us for decades all over the world???

You can throw the NY Slimes, the Compost, Slime/Newsweak phoney news mags and of course CNNCBSNBCABCCSPAN into the same group groveling for blood money from the Opecker Princes and Saddam. How much money have the Opecker Princes spent on ads to present their spin cycle about how good they are?

[Oldeconomybuyer]

I agree with that. Brit Hume will likely lead with this story.