Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MARK STEYN: Flying the flag
The Daily Telegraph ^ | September 7, 2002 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 09/06/2002 11:28:13 PM PDT by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: paulklenk
Only if it's a really good recipe.
21 posted on 09/07/2002 12:42:23 AM PDT by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
This thread wasn't doing anyone any harm. Mark Steyn is very popular on this board. YOU decided, whether out of hubris or an inflated sense of your own importance to make an issue out of it, and turn this thread, into an argument.

Brilliant. A nice patriotic piece turned into dross because you obviously have a bile spewing control problem, rivalling Linda Blair's escapades with hot pea soup. You are engaging in precisely the sort of behaviour that drives people away - people come here to discuss, not engage in fisticuffs with every passing fool who has more chips on his shoulder than brain cells.

Now run along. The adults on this thread would rather discuss the noble themes in this article than waste time with you.

Ivan

22 posted on 09/07/2002 12:51:47 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Bump-Bump

Great article!

Thanks for posting it.

23 posted on 09/07/2002 12:55:30 AM PDT by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
bump
24 posted on 09/07/2002 12:57:54 AM PDT by primeval patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Mark Steyn is very popular on this board. YOU decided, whether out of hubris or an inflated sense of your own importance to make an issue out of it, and turn this thread, into an argument.

Popular doesn't equal breaking news. It's an editorial. If you can't figure out the difference, educate yourself and try to do better next time. YOU turned it into a problem by 1] misposting, 2] acting snide when it was brought to your attention, and 3] failing to admit your mistake. Don't get mad at the adults just because they're trying to keep this site out of the toilet (and out of the control of the not-so-bright).

25 posted on 09/07/2002 12:58:26 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Mark Steyn is very popular on this board.

He sure is, and so are you. Thanks for posting it!

26 posted on 09/07/2002 1:00:36 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
By the way, you will notice I haven't chastised you for posting this editorial -- only for posting it in the wrong category. I am quite eager to join anyone else in supporting the fact that it has been posted.
27 posted on 09/07/2002 1:02:50 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
Popular doesn't equal breaking news. It's an editorial. If you can't figure out the difference, educate yourself and try to do better next time. YOU turned it into a problem by 1] misposting, 2] acting snide when it was brought to your attention, and 3] failing to admit your mistake. Don't get mad at the adults just because they're trying to keep this site out of the toilet (and out of the control of the not-so-bright).

Rubbish. If you wanted to handle this in a mature way, you would have messaged me privately. Rather, by posting this in public, you showed that you merely were hoping to provoke an argument. By doing so, you knew precisely that people would argue right back at you - and you did in such a superior, insufferable tone that it was demanding a response. This hardly marks you out as the guardian of the site's values and mores - a role which was not assigned to you anyway.

And you have the gall to claim to be the "adult". A genuine adult knows when to be discreet, when to fight, and when to remain silent. As I understand you have been banned from here before, I suppose you have difficulty with the last point.

Ivan

28 posted on 09/07/2002 1:05:16 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The stampede started almost immediately. On September 12, the Ottawa Citizen ran a column by Susan Riley headlined "At Times Like This, We Thank God That We're Canadians". Oh, God, I groaned, not the usual moral preening. But no, Ms Riley skipped that and went straight for naked self-interest: "Our best protection may be distancing ourselves a little more explicitly from US foreign policy … pursuing a reasonable and moderate course in the world's trouble spots."

I was not aware of this. It is profoundly disappointing.

29 posted on 09/07/2002 1:10:53 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
What's peculiar about that is that Le Monde, not necessarily an ally of America, had a headline, "We are all Americans now". You have to wonder about Canada's media if the French one was more pro-American after September 11th.

In the long run France's media reverted to type, but still.

Best Regards, Ivan

30 posted on 09/07/2002 1:13:32 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
It just makes me appreciate Brits (though not necessarily your press ; ) ) even more. You are true friends.
31 posted on 09/07/2002 1:16:36 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
As I understand you have been banned from here before, I suppose you have difficulty with the last point.

My friend, everyone with a brain has been banned from here before. Haven't you been paying attention? It is one of the ways we measure who is thinking for themselves and who is part of a herd of mindless cheerleaders. To have lasted, what, four years without being banned is not something to be self-satisfied about.

And for the record, I am using my original handle, the one I first signed up with.

I guess you have to be a Web designer or programmer or something to understand the value of keeping a site well organized.

32 posted on 09/07/2002 1:16:42 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator; Admin Moderator; MadIvan
Thanks for moving this from breaking to editorial. I apologize for having to yell "rat s**t" about it, but if you let me know the protocol for requesting such a move in the future, I'll follow it.

And Ivan, I think we've not only had a good time, we've also learned something. Good night.

33 posted on 09/07/2002 1:26:18 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
My friend, everyone with a brain has been banned from here before. Haven't you been paying attention? It is one of the ways we measure who is thinking for themselves and who is part of a herd of mindless cheerleaders. To have lasted, what, four years without being banned is not something to be self-satisfied about.

OUCH! I didn't know this. I've never heard of that before now.

I usually avoid "cheerleading," and banishment.

I thought it was enough just to be a critical thinker, thorough reader, and an occasional pithy poster (still working on that one).

I guess I'm going to have to work harder at this.

34 posted on 09/07/2002 1:43:50 AM PDT by Jagdgewehr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Le Monde, not necessarily an ally of America, had a headline, "We are all Americans now".

Written by Jean-Marie Colombani and published on September 12, 2001:

"We are all Americans now"

35 posted on 09/07/2002 1:44:44 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jagdgewehr
I guess I'm going to have to work harder at this.

Do that and I'll be your cheerleader. LOL!

36 posted on 09/07/2002 1:46:30 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
I guess you have to be a Web designer or programmer or something to understand the value of keeping a site well organized.
Do you think that people who sign up multiple accounts make "keeping a site well organized" a tougher job?
37 posted on 09/07/2002 2:09:34 AM PDT by KS Flyover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
My friend, everyone with a brain has been banned from here before. Haven't you been paying attention? It is one of the ways we measure who is thinking for themselves and who is part of a herd of mindless cheerleaders. To have lasted, what, four years without being banned is not something to be self-satisfied about.

I see. So one should aspire to be disagreeable and banned. Pardon me if I don't share your view of achieving intelligence - I thought it was achieved through education, study, thinking, discretion and good taste.

And for the record, I am using my original handle, the one I first signed up with.

Not that it matters much.

I guess you have to be a Web designer or programmer or something to understand the value of keeping a site well organized.

And what precisely do you think I do for a living? Again, you are carrying whatever personal demons you harbour onto this thread for no good purpose. If your intent was to get the thread moved, you could have done it far more discreetly without ruining the tenor or harmony of the thread. But this has given an insight into you - that somehow you equate rudeness with being intelligence, snobbishness with wit, pedantry with sophistication. If you aspire to be banned again, likely all you have to do is keep it up.

Ivan

38 posted on 09/07/2002 2:12:42 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Thanks for posting this, Ivan. Mr. Steyn is correct in still being angry, because I certainly am. I didn't know that about that Canadian columnist....blech!

Sorry you got hassled about this. It probably shouldn't have been in breaking news, but then lots of things wind up there some days, including announcements and fundraisers. A courteous, private message and a note to the moderator would have been sufficient.

At any rate, I appreciate you taking the time to post this and I am very glad you are here.

39 posted on 09/07/2002 3:13:23 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: paulklenk
A little friendly advice.

Wearing underwear too tight constricts the circulation of blood, thereby restricting the flow of oxygen to the brain which already suufers unduly in your particular case by siiting on it.

It is advisable at times like this to perhaps simply engage in that common nocturnal activity called sleep and let the neurons take a rest and pick up nutrients. It is obvious that your synaptic centers are way too overworked at the moment and need to be tended after.

Do it for the children.

40 posted on 09/07/2002 3:18:40 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson