Posted on 09/08/2002 11:45:20 AM PDT by Pat Bateman
California included.
when a man said that he believed that the Constitution of the USA protected the common man from harm by the government, one of the "officials" of the group said, "we just can't have those N#GGERS & spics carrying guns;they are ALL animals without sense".
when i spoke up against this OBVIOUS racism, i was told to "sit down & shut the (obscenity deleted) up! we don't want any input from (vulgarity deleted) like you".
so much for free speech & fair play.
free dixie,sw
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
The year 1840 is not all that long ago in the grand scheme of things. This article is a real eye opener. At that time they did not justify gun control as a safety issue for the general population, but as a means to control one group of people. Only a government that fears its citizens wants to disarm them.
"One of the biggest secrets is the racism that underlies so many people's support for gun control."
Was operative a hundred and more years ago, probably as few as sixty years ago.
Today we must realize, as few are capable, that we are ALL in that same category of 'less than equal' to the elite that intends to guide us...
Don't gotta be black, don't gotta be irish, don't gotta be nothing except not in agreement.
It is the right to stand up and defend against government excess (yes, even in a democracy) that is guraranteed by the Second Amendment.
"One of the biggest secrets is the racism that underlies so many people's support for gun control."
Was operative a hundred and more years ago, probably as few as sixty years ago.
Today we must realize, as few are capable, that we are ALL in that same category of 'less than equal' to the elite that intends to guide us...
Don't gotta be black, don't gotta be irish, don't gotta be nothing except not in agreement.
It is the right to stand up and defend against government excess (yes, even in a democracy) that is guraranteed by the Second Amendment.
I have forgotten many of the details, but several years ago I read a brief account of the origin of the infamous Sullivan law. I believe Sullivan was a corrupt NYC police commissioner who was heavily involved in protection rackets on the NYC waterfront. The Italian and other recent southern European immigrants who worked the docks were being shaken down for protection money by Sullivan's Irish cops and other Sullivan-employed thugs. Many arms and legs were broken when protection money wasn't forthcoming, and quite few uncooperative dockhands went to the bottom of NY harbor wearing "cement shoes". Of course the immigrant workers didn't exactly cotton to that sort of treatment, so many of them began buying and carrying cheap handguns and often using them to poke multiple holes in Sullivan's thugs. That's when Sullivan went to the "right" people in the city government with the "right" kind of persuasion ($) and had the "Sullivan" law enacted. At first the law was selectively enforced against victims of Sullivan's rackets, but it soon came to be a useful tool for helping the NYC establishment keep the lower classes in their "place". Even today 90 years later the wealthy, the "politically well connected", and most celebrities have little trouble aquiring a handgun permit in NYC, but any and all others may as well not bother to apply.
Actually, if memory serves, good ole 2nd amendment-loving TX was one of the first, if not THE first, states to pass a law against "civilians" carrying firearms in public, either openly or concealed. I believe that law, which still exists in a modified form BTW, went into effect sometime in the late 1870's, but I could be off by a few years either way. Apparently, if we are to believe all the shoot'em up tales and movies about frontier times in TX, that law was also enforced on a very selective basis. My grandfather was born and raised in the 1870's and 1880's on a ranch in Bexar county, but I neglected to ask him before he passed away in 1955 about how strictly TX gun laws were enforced in those turbulent days.
I'm sure some New Yorker(s) and Texan(s) out there in FReeperland will kindly correct me if I'm wrong about any of this.
New Jersey used to have "strict-but-reasonable" gun laws ( as these things go ! )Unfortunately, the laws were used as a basis to enact incrementally tougher laws, that evolved into the truly draconian code we have today.
In the "Garbage State" , anything you pick up and use to defend yourself is a "weapon", the instant you deploy, or offer to deploy it as such.If Granny threatens a would-be mugger with her cane,she is ( theoretically at least ) chargeable with: possession of a weapon other than a firearm,possession of a weapon for unlawful purposes (eg: threatening another ),and, a NJ invention : terroristic threats.
As might be imagined, any person who actually uses a ( gasp!choke! ) firearm for self-defense is beyond the pale in NJ !
Simply unbelievable that such a state of affairs could exist anywhere in the "land of the free and the home of the brave". I was aware that in recent years NJ has become one of the most liberal, and therefore most anti-gun, states, but I had not realized the situation was as bad as you say.
Thanks for the warning. Since I place a high priority on retaining my liberties and exercizing my rights, including the right to self defence, in the future I will do my best to avoid ever crossing the borders of the Garden State. I am sure there is a very good reason why it is necessary for you to live in such a repressive, anti-freedom environment, and my sympathies go out to you.
One of the biggest secrets is the racism that underlies so many people's support for gun control.
Gun grabbers are largely elitists. For many of them, they view minorities condescendingly as useful mascots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.