Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Newest Threat To Property Rights
Toogood Reports ^ | September 8, 2002; 12:01 a.m. EST | Peyton Knight

Posted on 09/08/2002 1:22:06 PM PDT by hammerdown

The newest threat to property rights, the foundation of American liberty, is posed by H.R. 2388, "The National Heritage Areas Policy Act." Sponsored by Rep. Joel Hefley (R-CO), H.R. 2388 is due for a vote any day now in the House of Representatives. H.R. 2388 creates a process whereby National Heritage Areas are created. It dangles federal tax dollars under the noses of the states, essentially begging them to designate land as a Heritage Area.

Once land is designated, it is subject to the whims and dictates of the National Park Service, setting the stage for a myriad of property rights abuses and land grabs. It is the key to the radical environmental plan to return as much of the United States landmass to wilderness as possible and to deny the use of as much land as possible to the development of new homes, apartments, businesses, and other uses.

The reality of Heritage Areas is a history of ravishing property rights. Heritage Areas are not simply honorary designations. They are vehicles for "sustainable development." Once a locality receives a "Heritage Area" designation, its zoning laws become subject to the control of the federal government and that control, more often than not, shuns property rights in favor of radical environmentalism.

Federal control over local zoning practices occurs in one of two ways. It can occur directly in a binding contract between state and federal agencies. Or it can occur indirectly with the federal government dispersing funds to environmental agencies or preservation groups who then draw up zoning plans that meet their narrow vision of the world. This second vehicle is the most sinister as it gives the impression that local control is preserved when, in reality, the federal government is just peddling its influence through another party.

Already a bad bill, H.R. 2388 has a propensity to become even worse as it travels through the legislative process. Amendments and revisions can and will be made on the House floor prior to voting and, if history is any indicator, those amendments may be something to fear.

Land Acquisition

Liberal Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV) is one of the biggest proponents of H.R. 2388. It should be noted that Rep. Rahall presides over the poverty-stricken Coal Heritage Area in West Virginia. A shining example of how Heritage Areas squelch economic development. When H.R. 2388 was being considered for a vote in the House Resources Committee, Rahall proposed an amendment to allow land acquisition authority. Fortunately, his amendment was rejected. However, H.R. 2388 will go through a similar process before the full House of Representatives and there is little doubt that Rahall and his land-grabbing cohorts will lobby to include land acquisition in H.R. 2388.

The Heritage Areas Act is by no means new to the scene. It existed in the form of H.R. 5044 back in 1994 when it passed the House, but later died in the Senate. Back then, Reps. Hefley and Rahall both sponsored an "Early Action" section in the Heritage Areas Act. What exactly are "Early Actions?" Let them tell you in their own words:

Section 106 (4): "EARLY ACTIONS: After designation of an American Heritage Area, but prior to approval of the management plan for that area, the Secretary may provide technical assistance for EARLY ACTIONS that are important to the theme of the area and that protect resources that would be in imminent danger of irreversible damage without such actions."

So basically, Hefley and Rahall wanted the National Park Service to provide cash and direction to local governments to do their tyrannical dirty work. "Early Actions" provide the bureaucrats in charge with the power to halt development in areas that are merely proposed for Heritage Area designation. Want to build a house on YOUR property? Not so fast! This area could eventually become a Heritage Area, and we think your house would endanger valuable resources. Never mind that it´s your property. Never mind that the Heritage Area doesn´t even officially exist. No house for you.

Economic Development

Supporters of the Heritage Areas Act are desperately trying to impress upon an increasingly gullible public that Heritage Areas are conducive to economic development. That this can be said with a straight face is nothing short of incredible. The enactment of zoning restrictions is hardly a recipe for economic health. In fact, stifling development usually spells misery for local economies and, in these uncertain times, the last thing communities need are federally mandated barriers to economic growth. The hypocrisy of H.R. 2388´s supporters knows some bounds. Even they couldn´t bring themselves to pen the words "economic development" in the actual text of the Heritage Areas Act.

Another aspect of the Heritage Areas Act´s sordid past bears mentioning. The 1994 version of the bill had a provision that allowed Heritage Areas to be designated as United Nations World Heritage Sites at the sole discretion of the Secretary of the Interior. Section 105 (b) (3) stated that the Interior Secretary shall "consider any American Heritage Area, designated under this or any other Act, for the nomination to the World Heritage List if the Secretary determines that such area meets the qualifications for such nominations." No hearings, no debate, no nothing.

The Tyranny of Land-Grabbers

When congressional committee hearings were held on H.R. 2388, the bill´s sponsors purposefully shut out property rights groups from voicing their concerns. Both the American Land Rights Association and the Property Rights Foundation of America requested to testify and both were rejected. In fact, during debate on the bill, perennial property rights champion Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA), offered a commonsense amendment to H.R. 2388 calling for property owners to be notified when their land falls within the boundaries of a Heritage Area. Incredibly, Rep. Hefley and his cohorts voted down this amendment! It seems that they would rather landowners be caught off-guard when the National Park Service comes for their property.

The National Heritage Areas Policy Act is just the latest attempt by the federal government to purchase influence over local communities and their zoning practices. This is not what our Founding Fathers envisioned. They founded our nation on the bedrock of property rights and federalism. That is our heritage. H.R. 2388 seeks to snuff it out.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: landgrab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 09/08/2002 1:22:06 PM PDT by hammerdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *landgrab; madfly; backhoe
ping
2 posted on 09/08/2002 1:23:37 PM PDT by hammerdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
This is pure Nationalist Socialism.

As soon as this is passed (if so), then all private property owners should get ready to bend way over, because...
3 posted on 09/08/2002 1:37:57 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
bttt
4 posted on 09/08/2002 1:39:41 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
yeah, and limbaugh and the rest of the useful idiots here will be beating the drum for the rnc on monday. are folks really that dumb, or is this all part of the agenda?
5 posted on 09/08/2002 1:40:17 PM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
Oh, that's alright, I'm sure it'll get vetoed. Right, W?
6 posted on 09/08/2002 1:42:11 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Since Teddy Roosevelt, upper income Republicans have been handing over the small property owner to the leftist.
7 posted on 09/08/2002 1:44:29 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
Hefley and Rahall were seen whispering to each other in a corner of the Capitol the other day, and thanks to some special infra-red photographic techniques, these very telling footprints were left by each, Hefley's on the right and Rahall's on the left...


8 posted on 09/08/2002 1:46:49 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN; Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Stand Watch Listen; ...
Heritage ping!
9 posted on 09/08/2002 1:53:13 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Well, that's starting to make me question my faith in the GOP. Oh wait, I don't have any. Never mind.
10 posted on 09/08/2002 1:56:00 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
The National Heritage Areas Policy Act is just the latest attempt by the federal government to purchase influence over local communities and their zoning practices.

The federal government, or the "51st. State" already owns early 50% of the land of the USA. This is not a good ratio of fed, state and private ownership. Any increase of this percentage is toward feudalism, which, coincidentally enough, is communism without currency.

This is not what our Founding Fathers envisioned.

It certainly isn't what they envisioned when they established federalism. It was supposed to be the government of last resort internally, first resort externally. In a hundred years there will be no states, only regions and regional commissions appointed by Wash. DC.

11 posted on 09/08/2002 1:58:34 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA), offered a commonsense amendment to H.R. 2388 calling for property owners to be notified when their land falls within the boundaries of a Heritage Area. Incredibly, Rep. Hefley and his cohorts voted down this amendment!

Unbelievable.

Let's see, what did Hefly's oath of office say? IIRC that was "forts, dockyards, and other needful buildings."

12 posted on 09/08/2002 2:01:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
I can see how this kind of a law could be a real problem.

- Gin

13 posted on 09/08/2002 2:03:10 PM PDT by Allrich Towing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN; AAABEST; Black Agnes; nunya bidness
In fact, during debate on the bill, perennial property rights champion Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA), offered a commonsense amendment to H.R. 2388 calling for property owners to be notified when their land falls within the boundaries of a Heritage Area. Incredibly, Rep. Hefley and his cohorts voted down this amendment! It seems that they would rather landowners be caught off-guard when the National Park Service comes for their property.

Pompo is on a growing list of Ron Paul's Liberty Caucus members. He is the only Californian. As opposed to the list of 59 socialists in the House. These guys go to bat for the people and get shut down most of the time.
I am hoping they can attract more liberty-minded reps. Last year they had 12 members. Now they have 20.

http://www.thelibertycommittee.org

Only one from Calif. Arizona has 3 members. Jeff Flake is running for Senate in 2004. If you get on thier mailing list, you get emails when a Congressman joins up.

The Liberty Caucus
  U.S. House
Ron Paul, Chairman, Texas

Roscoe Bartlett, Maryland
Chris Cannon, Utah
John Duncan, Tennessee
Jeff Flake, Arizona
Virgil Goode, Virginia
John Hostettler, Indiana
Walter Jones, North Carolina
Brian Kerns, Indiana

Jack Kingston, Georgia
Jeff Miller, Florida
Butch Otter, Idaho
Richard Pombo, California
Denny Rehberg, Montana
Bob Schaffer, Colorado
John Shadegg, Arizona
Bob Stump, Arizona
Tom Tancredo, Colorado
Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania
Zach Wamp, Tennessee
Dave Weldon, Florida

Subscribe to the Liberty Committee for emails and Action Alerts

Fight for Freedom
 

Join Congressman Ron Paul and the other 20 members of The Liberty Caucus 
along with thousands of Americans from coast-to-coast in the fight for freedom. 

 

"Participate in the legislative process
or live by the laws of the people who do."
Congressman Ron Paul

 

Sign up to receive our Alerts & Updates so when there is a need for action, you  will know.  You will also receive our Behind-the-Scenes News.



14 posted on 09/08/2002 2:04:00 PM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
A link to this article just went winging out in a mass email to the usual suspects in 'netland. It will get seen beyond this board...
John R
15 posted on 09/08/2002 2:07:26 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN
Rep. Joel Hefley (R-CO), is an example of a "Matronised" politician. This type of legislation plays well back home with the matronly ladies of the League of Women Voters. It is part of the "Sissification" of America. Why isn't there a League of Voting Men?
16 posted on 09/08/2002 2:09:31 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAMMERDOWN; madfly
A "Republican" from Colorado introduced this bill? You know what Ann Coulter says about conservatives who begin to do the Left's dirty work for them? She says, in Slander, that such a Republican is being blackmailed by the Left....they've got him under their thumb. Wonder what the R-CO is so desperate to hide?
17 posted on 09/08/2002 2:28:02 PM PDT by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Something with leather straps and a rubber ball.
18 posted on 09/08/2002 2:40:34 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Hi friend, I see you're pithier than ever.

BTW what are your chances of getting to FL in the near future?

19 posted on 09/08/2002 2:52:03 PM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
BUMP for property rights and freedom!
20 posted on 09/08/2002 2:57:55 PM PDT by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson