Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's 'Lost' nuclear luggage
Pakistan News Service ^ | NOVEMBER 3, 1998 | from Eric Margolis

Posted on 09/10/2002 8:52:21 AM PDT by vannrox

Russia's 'Lost' nuclear luggage ........................ from Eric Margolis




NOVEMBER 3, 1998 - Last year, Gen. Alexander Lebed, Russia's former National Security Advisor, claimed more than 100 suitcase-sized nuclear weapons had 'disappeared.' Another senior Russian security official, Alexei Yablokov, backed Lebed's allegations.


Lebed, now a presidential candidate, asserted Russia's military had lost track of the portable nuclear weapons, each of which can produce a 1 kiloton explosion, equivalent to 1,000 tons of TNT. A single suitcase nuke, placed in an urban area, could kill up to 100,000 people and cause enormous physical damage.


Russian security officials scoffed at Lebed's claims, blaming poor record keeping rather than theft or diversion. US officials claimed Libya, Iraq and Iran were the real nuclear danger, not mini-nukes. In fact, these nations pose a potential threat only to Israel. By contrast, Russia's missing nukes are a very real menace to US security.


Two months ago, the highest ranking officer ever to defect from GRU, Russia's military intelligence service, testified in closed hearings before Congress. The former GRU colonel, who defected in 1992, said he had personally identified locations in the US for suitcase nuclear devices that would be used in case of war.


The colonel admitted he had no knowledge any devices had actually been smuggled into the US, but said 'it was possible,' because many of the weapons had disappeared from Russia's inventory. Meaning the mini-nukes are either missing - and possibly in the hands of terrorists - or secreted in the United States, Canada, and Europe.


The Soviet mini-nukes, described as the size of a golf club bag, were designed to destroy vital targets, such as military command and control centers, air defense headquarters, missile bases, communications nodes, power stations, bridges, dams, airports, and the St. Lawrence Seaway. If one such weapon, hidden in the back of a delivery van, were detonated outside the Pentagon, America's military leadership would be decapitated.


The GRU colonel explained the mini-nukes were to be smuggled into the US the same way drugs were - by speedboat, light aircraft, or landed on the coast by Soviet subs. Soviet special force 'Spetsnaz' units would retrieve the weapons and conceal them close to their intended targets. One key hiding place was Northern Virginia's beautiful Shenandoah Valley, located a short drive from Washington.


The colonel also revealed that during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, the Soviets stockpiled suitcase nuclear weapons in Cuba without the knowledge of Castro, ready for use by special forces troops. KGB sources also recently told me that at the height of the crisis, Soviet commanders in Cuba were authorized to launch intermediate range ballistic missiles against the US and Canada if communications links with Moscow were broken or jammed.


The US also developed a 1-kiloton nuclear suitcase bomb designed for the same tactical demolition role as the Soviet version. If the Warsaw Pact attacked westward, US Special Forces were tasked to employ the mini-nukes for behind-the- lines sabotage of Soviet command, logistics and communications. US Army field commanders were given release authority over hundreds of tactical mini-nukes in Europe, independent of NATO.


Some House Republicans claim the Soviets may have actually hidden a number of nuclear devices near Washington and New York City, where they remain. Some could still be active. Such simple, pure-fission nuclear devices may have a shelf- life of up to 8-10 years without refurbishing.


US security officials, who have been nonchalant about hidden suitcase nukes, should bear in mind the stranger- than-fiction case of a GRU 'sleeper' agent who settled in Edmonton, Canada, the late 1940's as a supposed refugee from Ukraine. A decade ago, he turned himself into the RCMP, and showed them a large, trunk-bomb he had hidden in his basement. His orders: when a coded signal comes in from GRU, transport the conventional bomb in his truck to a main oil pumping station north of Edmonton, and destroy it. He had been waiting nearly 40 years.


How many other such sleepers are out there? How many have nuclear devices? This is pretty scary stuff. Not just for North America, either. Rumors have circulated for years that Israeli agents may have hidden suitcase nukes in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Kiev, Odessa, Sevastapol, and Kharkov, not to mention Arab capitols, Tehran, even Pakistan.


The danger of terrorists getting their hands on a suitcase bomb is real, but lower. Arming the mini-nukes takes 30 minutes, the colonel revealed, and can only be done by trained specialists. The weapons are designed to self- destruct if improperly opened.


Unless, of course, terrorists or the Russian mafia manage to buy a nuclear specialist, or open the weapon's locks.A suitcase nuke attached to a drum of anthrax or botulism would be a hellish terror weapon, ideal for political fanatics or blackmailers. Defenses against such weapons are currently minimal, though the US is trying to develop senors that will detect hidden nuclear weapons.


We shouldn't panic about reds under our beds with suitcase nukes, but we shouldn't ignore this very real threat, either. Given the number of Soviet suitcase nukes still hidden, or unaccounted for, it seems probable at least one will eventually be used somewhere.


Copyright Margolis, November 1998



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; bomb; china; damage; hate; iran; iraq; nuclear; radiation; russia; saddam; war; wtc
SOmething to add to your calculus.
1 posted on 09/10/2002 8:52:22 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Didn't I read that there was a "life" to these devices......that they needed maintenance and didn't remain operational forever. Anyone provide more information????
2 posted on 09/10/2002 8:59:59 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The woods are lovely dark and deepp and I have miles to walk brfore I sleep.....Remember

The good news is that maybe this is just sloopy record keeping. The bad news is we have no way of knowing who actually controls some of these weapons if anyone does anymore. We are betting lives that someone trustworthy is in control of these devices.

My initial quote is a Robert Frost poem used in the moie Telelphon

3 posted on 09/10/2002 9:05:31 AM PDT by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
I wouldn't be surprised of Al Qaeda, Iraq or some other terrorist had a portable nuke. But, I don't think they have the working fissionable material to detonate it.

This is why its important to remove Saddam, and break up Al Qaeda.
4 posted on 09/10/2002 9:09:57 AM PDT by caa26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Interesting that a 4 year old article on this has finaly hit the Pakistani press. I thought they were about 400 years behind the times.
5 posted on 09/10/2002 9:24:37 AM PDT by Woodman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
A suitcase nuke attached to a drum of anthrax or botulism would be a hellish terror weapon, ideal for political fanatics or blackmailers.

The nuclear blast and aftermath would be the hellish part, the anthrax/botulism would be obliterated by the explosion.

6 posted on 09/10/2002 9:24:58 AM PDT by ALASKA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; All
Tiny Nukes-- the backpack threat

Nuclear News you *can* use--

7 posted on 09/10/2002 9:34:39 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Again, there is no need for a ballistic missile to deliver a nuclear weapon.

All it takes is a cargo ship, a civilian airliner, or, in the case of a small one, a Toyota Camry. And the will to do it.
8 posted on 09/10/2002 9:35:28 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This story may be true or not, but the late General Lebed was trying to take power at the time, and scaring the living s--t out of Russia and the United States was one way to do so. So the credibility of this story is somewhat suspect. If Washington's nuked, I'll likely be one of the first to go, so you'll really not be able to tell me "I told you so."
9 posted on 09/10/2002 9:38:51 AM PDT by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
FOR SALE ON E-bay here.
10 posted on 09/10/2002 10:01:52 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All
"...during the *1962* missile crisis...soviets stockpiled suitcase nukes in cuba..."...if the state of technology 40 years ago...was sufficient to build suitcase nukes...just think...isn't it mind boggling to consider what weapons present day technology makes available today...?
11 posted on 09/10/2002 10:02:05 AM PDT by gPal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
"...the *late* general lebed..."??...is he dead...if so, i somehow missed it
12 posted on 09/10/2002 10:04:53 AM PDT by gPal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gPal
...the *late* general lebed..."??...is he dead...if so, i somehow missed it

His helicopter crashed back in April. Some blame Putin or local mafiosi, but most folks think it was just an accident since the guy was powerless.

13 posted on 09/10/2002 10:09:36 AM PDT by andy_card
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: andy_card
...thanks for your response!...then he was killed in the helicopter crash?...if so, i just somehow missed it and i used to enjoy following his shenannegans(?)...
14 posted on 09/10/2002 10:52:01 AM PDT by gPal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
"The good news is that maybe this is just sloopy record keeping."

Hang on, Sloopy, hang on.

"Maybe" is not "good news".

15 posted on 09/10/2002 6:38:52 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson