Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Anybody else hear this on Rush today? I'm sure glad Rush provided an audio link on his website. Please send this link to your friends. Daschle & Clinton are exposed as the hypocritical FRAUDS that they are.
1 posted on 09/10/2002 5:40:10 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nutmeg
BTTT
2 posted on 09/10/2002 5:41:14 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
I just finished a brain tennis match with a liberal lawyer childhood pal o mine, where I learned something valuable and time-saving.

For a true liberal, all precedent, everything that ocurred before W was sworn in, is deemed immaterial. Even mentioning something that took place before Jan 2001, unless it involves Nixonian duplicity, is BY DEFINITION a cowardly attempt to change the subject.

Also, ALL counter-examples, by definition, are non-sequitors. Period.

This covers all war and ethics related issues, and is a real time-saver.

3 posted on 09/10/2002 5:45:37 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Hey, Bill's not facing impeachment now, so why should his 1998 statements apply? You Freepers insist on taking statements like these out of context.
13 posted on 09/10/2002 7:11:30 PM PDT by Norman Conquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Liberal...lying...hypocrites!!!

They are not with US, so they must be with the terrorists.
14 posted on 09/10/2002 7:58:50 PM PDT by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
In case you don't or can't get the audio, consider this for fodder:
________________________
"Democrats say action was 'quick and decisive'
Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle and House Minority leader Dick Gephardt issued a statement of support for the military strike and its timing.

"We fully support the president's decision today to undertake military action with our allies against Iraq," Daschle and Gephardt said. "Saddam Hussein's defiance of U.N. weapons inspectors is a clear violation of the international community's determination to ensure that Iraq no longer poses a threat to the region."

The two Democrats said Clinton "acted correctly and responsibly by taking quick and decisive action against Saddam Hussein's egregious behavior."

"Any delay would have given Saddam Hussein time to reconstitute his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and undermine international support for our efforts," Daschle and Gephardt said. "It also would have been contrary to the president's commitment in November to respond militarily to future Iraqi provocations."

Gephardt and Daschle also alluded to the pending impeachment debate, saying, "Saddam Hussein should make no mistake that despite domestic political differences in the United States, the American people and Congress stand firmly behind the defense of our nation's vital interests." "
______________
Source: Allpolitics.com, December 16, 1998
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/congressional.react/
18 posted on 09/11/2002 8:43:30 AM PDT by 1L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
This is being spun as an example of petty partisanship, but it may be worse than that. There has been a noticeable increase in democrat dovishness in the last few weeks, since it was announced that the Saudis had hired certain Washington law firms associated with democrats in pursuit of their "public relations" efforts. Now these firms are not engaging in any known legal work. How it works is this: they are paid a lot of money for "consulting." Then individual partners "separately" make large personal contributions and hold fundraisers for selected politicians. In other words, the influence that they sell really consists of money laundering. If we had any real investigative reporting, i.e., if the media was not just a wing of the democrat party, we would see reporting on the contribution activities of members of these law firms subsequent to the Saudi involvement. Where Cindy Jihad made her mistake was taking the money directly from Arab interests. This put the democrat party in a bind, because it was infuriating their big Jewish donors in NY and Hollywood who raise about 30% of their money.
19 posted on 09/11/2002 9:26:07 AM PDT by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
The Dass' is a Monster! Bump!
20 posted on 09/11/2002 3:12:12 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
The Devil and his 1st Senatorial Disciple in 1998 BUMP!
23 posted on 09/19/2002 10:03:12 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson