Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain to fight Saddam on three fronts (Great graphics)
Daily Telegraph ^ | Filed: 14/09/2002 | Michael Smith, Defence Correspondent

Posted on 09/14/2002 5:12:42 AM PDT by maquiladora

Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, arrives back from Kuwait this morning with full details of what America wants Britain to provide towards the forces lined up against Iraq.

Although officials continue to insist that no decision has been made on whether to go ahead, they admit that contingency plans are in place.

The Ministry of Defence has set up a Target Planning Group to select targets for attacks by US and RAF aircraft on the no-fly zones in Iraq.

Senior defence sources confirmed that Tornado GR4s patrolling the zones would be equipped with precision-guided Storm Shadow missiles to provide "more punch".

Gen Tommy Franks, the US commander in the region, is known to want an extremely strong force of about 250,000 - including a British armoured division - to attack Iraq on three fronts.

Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, insists that all possible options must be examined and that Gen Franks should think "out of the box" to come up with plans, but a full-scale invasion is seen as the only realistic choice.

That would require three thrusts, one by US airborne troops, probably accompanied by elements of the Colchester-based 16 Air Assault Brigade, to occupy Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq.

British and US special forces are already on the ground in the region and US air force engineers have already relaid three large air bases.

The second thrust would be an amphibious assault on the south via Bubiyan island by a US Marine Corps expeditionary force, possibly including the Royal Marines 3 Commando Brigade.

This would be bound to involve the Royal Navy, since the area is heavily mined and America has no specialist mine-seeking ships. It is also expected to involve the aircraft carrier Ark Royal and the amphibious assault carrier Ocean.

Ark Royal is on its way to the Mediterranean, where it will be joined by the destroyers Southampton and Edinburgh prior to carrying out amphibious landing exercises with other Nato forces.

The third and final phase will be a classic armoured advance from Kuwait into southern Iraq by five armoured divisions, one of them the Army's main armoured force, 1 Armoured Division, based at Herford in Germany.

It will be stripped of one of its brigades, 20 Armoured Brigade, much of which is currently serving in Kosovo and Bosnia to form a two-brigade "light" division.

The most famous of the two brigades is probably 7th -Armoured Brigade, the "Desert Rats", based in Bergen-Hohne and Fallingbostel. The brigade was due to take part in an exercise in Poland but this was cut down to a single battalion in anticipation of a possible deployment to Kuwait.

The other brigade will be 4th Armoured Brigade, which is based at Osnabruck and Munster, and like 7th Armoured Brigade took part in the 1991 Gulf war.

Kuwaiti government officials confirmed yesterday that Britain planned to deploy a "light" armoured division there in the coming months.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2002 5:12:43 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Was there ever really any doubt?
2 posted on 09/14/2002 5:16:43 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Loose freakin' lips!!!!!!!
3 posted on 09/14/2002 5:18:05 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
It's on the front page of a UK newspaper.
4 posted on 09/14/2002 5:19:13 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Not you - last thing I'd wanna do is shoot the messenger here. I'm talking about the brainless writer/editor at the newspaper that printed this thing in the first place!
5 posted on 09/14/2002 5:20:39 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Marines to make beach assault.
Hehe.
Just like last time.
6 posted on 09/14/2002 5:20:40 AM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mhking
IMO, mis-information is probably a better description.
7 posted on 09/14/2002 5:21:55 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Like Rummy said 9 months ago. "Maybe we will tell the truth, maybe we wont."




8 posted on 09/14/2002 5:24:28 AM PDT by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
From the American media, I'd agree. But the British media is so brain-damaged, they'd print the truth even if someone begged them not to...
9 posted on 09/14/2002 5:25:06 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Yep, but perhaps this time they will do it....

It's keepin Saddam guessing.

10 posted on 09/14/2002 5:25:32 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
15-1
11 posted on 09/14/2002 5:30:17 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Have you seen anything today about Putin asking the UN for the ok to go into Georgia after terrorists?

I have been looking at maps and thinking.

12 posted on 09/14/2002 5:33:46 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

13 posted on 09/14/2002 5:35:02 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I'm reminded of the first Gulf War, where the Pentagon told the news media exactly what we were going to do, and then did something completely different. Sometimes, when the military leaks, they do it on purpose.
14 posted on 09/14/2002 5:38:45 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Why the hell does Putin need approval from the UN? It's like going to to a cop and asking "Can I go punch that guy over there, please?"

Attack, or dont attack- deal with the consequences later. Although I do not approve of Putin going after "terrorists" in Georgia (known to the U.S. as Chechen rebels), I have more disapproval for the UN and their assembly of thugs, terrorists, and tin-horn dictators.

15 posted on 09/14/2002 5:42:14 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: maquiladora
"British and US special forces are already on the ground in the region and US air force engineers have already relaid three large air bases"

It's already started. Remember when over 100 Brit and US planes particiipated in taking out air defenses last week? I bet the turnaround in French, Dutch, and Spanish attitude ( and others) is due not just to President Bush's great speech at the UN, but also due to the fact the we and the Brits already have boots on the ground and the clock is running.

17 posted on 09/14/2002 5:46:23 AM PDT by Reo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
That is the point. Putin doesn't need permission. He does, however, need an EXPLANATION of why he is moving troops into Georgia.
18 posted on 09/14/2002 5:49:46 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
It's on the front page of a UK newspaper? Doesn't make it right! In fact it probably makes it wrong as in "misinformation." Dollars to donuts the Brits will be holding the towel while we TCB. "Just stand over there out of the way. This shouldn't take long." About seven days to occupy Baghdad and Saddam will be eliminated by the locals hopefully(like the Italians took care of Benito) otherwise Saddam will be long gone to Switzerland. Personally I like the Marine Corps Sniper way "one shot, one kill" and we all come home. Semper Fi
19 posted on 09/14/2002 5:51:43 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
MARINE BUMP
20 posted on 09/14/2002 5:52:51 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson