Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Let's Cool the Rhetoric, U.S. Lawmaker (D) in Iraq Says (BAARF)

Posted on 09/14/2002 8:13:55 AM PDT by Dallas

BAGHDAD (Reuters) -

A U.S. Congressman visiting Baghdad said on Saturday the United States and Iraq should start talking to avert a second devastating Gulf War ( news - web sites).

Photo
Reuters Photo

"It is time to cool the rhetoric and start a dialogue between our two countries," Representative Nick Rahall, a West Virginia Democrat, said during a meeting with Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz.

President Bush ( news - web sites) has demanded that the United Nations ( news - web sites) impose a deadline for Iraq to obey its resolutions to disarm or face the consequences.

Baghdad has flatly rejected Bush's demand for a swift and unconditional return of U.N. arms inspectors, raising the stakes in their high-risk confrontation and bringing closer the specter of a second Gulf War against the nation with the second largest oil reserves in the world.

"We feel very strongly that this open dialogue is much better than going to any harsh military action that will only evoke more suffering upon the people of Iraq and more suffering on our environment," Rahall said.

His visit is the first in several years by a U.S. legislator. Iraq has been under U.N. sanctions since it invaded Kuwait in 1990. The two countries severed relations shortly before the United States led a coalition of forces that drove Iraqi forces out of Kuwait in the 1991 Gulf War.

"We are not here as secretaries of state, we are not here as weapons inspectors, we are here as concerned Americans," Rahall said.

Rahall is accompanied by a delegation that includes former Senator James Abourezk and Norman Solomon, who heads the Institute for Public Accuracy -- a think tank with offices in Washington and San Francisco.

A member of Rahall's delegation told Reuters television earlier that they would ask Baghdad to allow unconditional return of U.N. weapons inspectors who left the country on the eve of U.S.-British bombing campaign in December 1998. They have not been allowed in since.

"We are going to recommend that they allow inspectors to come back full time and they allow them to do what they are suppose to do," Abourezek said.

It is not known yet whether Rahall and his group would meet President Saddam Hussein ( news - web sites).

"We also want to tell the Iraqi people that the American people for the most part are peace wagering individuals not warmongers," Rahall said.

Rahall, a descendant of Lebanese peddlers who made their way to West Virginia to sell their wares to coal miners, said he wanted " to look for nutrition needs and medicine needs of the Iraqi people and find out what I can do about that."

The Iraqi press center said on Saturday Rahall and his group visited a hospital in Baghdad.

He wanted to acquaint himself with the real situation in Iraq "as a concerned member of the Congress who will be asked to vote upon the (Iraq) issue that may be put before the Congress in the next several weeks."

Rahall who backed the first president Bush during the Gulf War, told Reuters in Washington that he agrees "Saddam must go" but he has "serious questions" about the current U.S. policy.

"Why now, two months before an election? Why was the threat so serious now that it wasn't a year ago. I've seen certainly no link of Iraq to 9/11 (suicide hijack attacks on September 11, 2001 which killed over 3,000 people in the United States)... I just don't see linkage there."

Rahall said the "true enemies" are al Qaeda, the accused perpetrators of the September 11 attacks, and the focus should remain on defeating them.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: westvirginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 09/14/2002 8:13:55 AM PDT by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Whoops....

Houston, we have a formatting problem.....

2 posted on 09/14/2002 8:15:10 AM PDT by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
ROFL! What's that congressman doing in Iraq? Looking for a bribe? Asking for a tour?
3 posted on 09/14/2002 8:18:13 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
ROFL! What's that congressman doing in Iraq?

Another reason to have a fast vote in congress; do it while he's out of town.

4 posted on 09/14/2002 8:20:29 AM PDT by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Fast vote in congress. Yeah. Maybe the bombs will drop quickly enough to extend his stay there. =]
5 posted on 09/14/2002 8:23:53 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
W. Va Congressman (Dim) to Fly to Iraq (MEGA-BARF) ^
6 posted on 09/14/2002 8:26:30 AM PDT by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
< TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="1%" align=left border=0>

Me thinks it's that 1% width.

7 posted on 09/14/2002 8:28:30 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
I've seen certainly no link of Iraq to 9/11 (suicide hijack attacks on September 11, 2001 which killed over 3,000 people in the United States)... I just don't see linkage there."

No linkage, eh? Bush has already mentioned a linkage between Al Qaeda and Iraq. Does this worm, grovelling before Saddam, think that Bush doesn't have evidence to back up what he says? In the words of Mr. T: I PREDICT PAIN.

8 posted on 09/14/2002 8:29:10 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
What is the chance of defeating this fool in the election?

Or are there just too many Yellow Dog Democrats still voting for FDR to get rid of this guy?

9 posted on 09/14/2002 8:29:37 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
It's very clear why Bush doesn't want to tell Con-gress jack, isn't it?
10 posted on 09/14/2002 8:32:45 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
"...We also want to tell the Iraqi people that the American people for the most part are peace wagering individuals not warmongers," Rahall said."

I don't know Congressman Rahall, I used to be more peace wagering but as of September 11, 2001 my heart has less peace in it and a hell of a lot more warmongering against America's enemies and cannot sleep knowing that there exists in this world and in our own country evil sickos that gleefully plot to bring this great Republic down.

No, Sir, I beg to differ, I will proudly fight to the best of my abilities to protect, defend, and preserve my country, my family and my neighbors.


"It is by Heritage and Choice
We Will Make This Stand"
America Will Not Back Down
Never Has
Never Will

11 posted on 09/14/2002 8:37:17 AM PDT by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
It's very clear why Bush doesn't want to tell Con-gress jack, isn't it?

You read my mind. I wouldn't tell him anything either.

12 posted on 09/14/2002 8:41:17 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
....any harsh military action that will only evoke more suffering upon the people of Iraq and more suffering on our environment," Rahall said.

Those bombs are really hard on The Earth Mother. There has to be another way.

13 posted on 09/14/2002 8:45:05 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
Maybe he and his family should move back to Lebanon.
14 posted on 09/14/2002 8:47:53 AM PDT by Militiaman7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
Another McKinneyesque traitor, from the party of slime
15 posted on 09/14/2002 9:32:16 AM PDT by republicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
"...and more suffering on our environment," Rahall said.

That should go over good in Rahall's coal mining state.

16 posted on 09/14/2002 9:40:38 AM PDT by Undertow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dallas
I'm told Rahall has MONDO Gambling debts out in Vegas (I recall he had a DUI out there not long ago) and he only went to Iraq to get on the same Gravy Train that Scott Ritter jumped on for Hussein's money to cover those debts.
17 posted on 09/14/2002 9:42:45 AM PDT by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
Down in West Virginia, they ARE heavilly FDR Dumocrap. Once you're elected to Congress, you usually have a pretty safe ride to retirement unless you seriously screw the pooch, or like Shelly Moore Capito, you're Republican and you have to constantly watch your back & account for all the lies your Dumocrap opponent can shovel to take your seat.
18 posted on 09/14/2002 9:50:06 AM PDT by Wondervixen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All
Related thread here.
19 posted on 09/14/2002 9:51:41 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dallas

BAGHDAD (Reuters) -

A U.S. Congressman visiting Baghdad said on Saturday the United States and Iraq should start talking to avert a second devastating Gulf War ( news - web sites).

Photo
Reuters Photo
"It is time to cool the rhetoric and start a dialogue between our two countries," Representative Nick Rahall, a West Virginia Democrat, said during a meeting with Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz.

President Bush ( news - web sites) has demanded that the United Nations ( news - web sites) impose a deadline for Iraq to obey its resolutions to disarm or face the consequences.

Baghdad has flatly rejected Bush's demand for a swift and unconditional return of U.N. arms inspectors, raising the stakes in their high-risk confrontation and bringing closer the specter of a second Gulf War against the nation with the second largest oil reserves in the world.

"We feel very strongly that this open dialogue is much better than going to any harsh military action that will only evoke more suffering upon the people of Iraq and more suffering on our environment," Rahall said.

His visit is the first in several years by a U.S. legislator. Iraq has been under U.N. sanctions since it invaded Kuwait in 1990. The two countries severed relations shortly before the United States led a coalition of forces that drove Iraqi forces out of Kuwait in the 1991 Gulf War.

"We are not here as secretaries of state, we are not here as weapons inspectors, we are here as concerned Americans," Rahall said.

Rahall is accompanied by a delegation that includes former Senator James Abourezk and Norman Solomon, who heads the Institute for Public Accuracy -- a think tank with offices in Washington and San Francisco.

A member of Rahall's delegation told Reuters television earlier that they would ask Baghdad to allow unconditional return of U.N. weapons inspectors who left the country on the eve of U.S.-British bombing campaign in December 1998. They have not been allowed in since.

"We are going to recommend that they allow inspectors to come back full time and they allow them to do what they are suppose to do," Abourezek said.

It is not known yet whether Rahall and his group would meet President Saddam Hussein ( news - web sites).

"We also want to tell the Iraqi people that the American people for the most part are peace wagering individuals not warmongers," Rahall said.

Rahall, a descendant of Lebanese peddlers who made their way to West Virginia to sell their wares to coal miners, said he wanted " to look for nutrition needs and medicine needs of the Iraqi people and find out what I can do about that."

The Iraqi press center said on Saturday Rahall and his group visited a hospital in Baghdad.

He wanted to acquaint himself with the real situation in Iraq "as a concerned member of the Congress who will be asked to vote upon the (Iraq) issue that may be put before the Congress in the next several weeks."

Rahall who backed the first president Bush during the Gulf War, told Reuters in Washington that he agrees "Saddam must go" but he has "serious questions" about the current U.S. policy.

"Why now, two months before an election? Why was the threat so serious now that it wasn't a year ago. I've seen certainly no link of Iraq to 9/11 (suicide hijack attacks on September 11, 2001 which killed over 3,000 people in the United States)... I just don't see linkage there."

Rahall said the "true enemies" are al Qaeda, the accused perpetrators of the September 11 attacks, and the focus should remain on defeating them.


20 posted on 09/14/2002 9:53:50 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson