Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Speed of light broken with basic lab kit
New Scientist.com ^ | 16 September 02 | Charles Choi

Posted on 09/16/2002 7:26:53 AM PDT by aculeus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

1 posted on 09/16/2002 7:26:53 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maxwell; Robert A. Cook, PE
max, is this the kind of stuff you play around with all day?
2 posted on 09/16/2002 7:29:28 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
This is weird BUMP.
3 posted on 09/16/2002 7:31:10 AM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Amazing! Faster processing time means another step towards meaningful artificial intelligence. This means another step towards autonomous battlefield "robots". (Pretty scary in way)

(If Bell Laboratories can hire these guys, maybe Lucent stock will become worth something again.)

4 posted on 09/16/2002 7:31:58 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Signals also get weaker and more distorted the faster they go, so in theory no useful information can get transmitted at faster-than-light speeds, though Robertson hopes his students and others can now rigorously and cheaply test those ideas.

Given that the peak can be observed, and its speed measured, this statement seems to be incorrect. A frequency modulation scheme would seem to offer a way of transmitting information.

5 posted on 09/16/2002 7:33:55 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Signals also get weaker and more distorted the faster they go, so in theory no useful information can get transmitted at faster-than-light speeds,

That is not true, since by accurately timing the distortion you could take it into account. As well, sending a known test signal down the line before transmitting data would allow you to adjust for any slight differences due to temperature, etc.

6 posted on 09/16/2002 7:34:35 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Alot of the slowdown in the future is not going to be the rate at which our computers receive data, but at how it processes it. You throw 200 GB in one second at your computer and see what happens.
7 posted on 09/16/2002 7:35:43 AM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
bump .... so where's the warp drive already ? ;)
8 posted on 09/16/2002 7:36:59 AM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Speed of light broken with basic lab kit...

Wasn't me, I was taking a shower!

I hope this isn't series.

9 posted on 09/16/2002 7:37:01 AM PDT by FreedomFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mercy; All
Now physicists at Middle Tennessee State University have broken that speed limit over distances of nearly ...

Another reason not to fixate on "prestige" universities.

10 posted on 09/16/2002 7:40:31 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Ha! And I've been snickering at my six-year-old son's plan to build his own rocket. When I explained that he'd have to study and then work for NASA, he said, "No, we can just go shopping at Home Depot." Maybe the kid is right.
11 posted on 09/16/2002 7:45:20 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFarmer
I think it's very series. One day we will be able to send messages from the Moon to the Earth at faster than the speed of light. Then a father could explain to his kids that the Moon isn't made of cheese, while his son could tell the father all about how a moose bit his sister..., and all in record time.
12 posted on 09/16/2002 7:45:24 AM PDT by Notforprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"In a related announcement, the staff of Middle Tennessee State University have 'solved' the Unified Field Theory utilizing six soda straws, three empty beer cans, a ten-year-old Timex man's watch (leather band), twenty feet of plastic tubing (1/4" diameter), and duct tape."
13 posted on 09/16/2002 7:47:41 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; xsmommy
Well, of course this isn't really news....

The National press corpse used to get their daily fax followup questions and spin briefing from the dnc even before the the media broadcast the first batch of lies from Hillary's White House.
14 posted on 09/16/2002 7:54:20 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
Maybe the kid is right.

In a sense he is right. You really can build most of the necessary stuff from readily-available materials and get to some sort of orbit.

The cost comes when you start trying for high performance, precision, reliability, and (for manned flight) getting the crew home alive.

15 posted on 09/16/2002 7:57:39 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Notforprophet
Some politician is gonna demand a speed limit be set and enforced, for 'da chilwrens', with his sister's cousin's second step-critter in charge of 'rite'n dem speeders up' for life.
16 posted on 09/16/2002 7:57:44 AM PDT by FreedomFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I knew that appointing Jethro Bodine to the Middle Tennessee faculty would finally pay off!
17 posted on 09/16/2002 8:00:00 AM PDT by ArcLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline
LOL! Now if they could just solve the problem of chewing tobacco dribble, they'd be state heroes!
18 posted on 09/16/2002 8:01:18 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFarmer
NYTimes: "Speed of Light Broken: Women and Minorities Hit Hardest."
19 posted on 09/16/2002 8:01:50 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
QUESTION TO ALL:
 
Doesn't Einstein's theory imply that if something travels faster than the speed of light, it would travel backward in time?
 
That means if an electronic signal is traveling along a certain length of cable then the signal would arrive at it's destination at a point in space time prior to the point in space time that the switch was thrown to SEND THE SIGNAL in the first place. (Theme to jeopardy playing in background) 
 
Any thoughts?.....And the SURVEY SAID?: 

20 posted on 09/16/2002 8:02:25 AM PDT by webboss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson