Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aculeus
QUESTION TO ALL:
 
Doesn't Einstein's theory imply that if something travels faster than the speed of light, it would travel backward in time?
 
That means if an electronic signal is traveling along a certain length of cable then the signal would arrive at it's destination at a point in space time prior to the point in space time that the switch was thrown to SEND THE SIGNAL in the first place. (Theme to jeopardy playing in background) 
 
Any thoughts?.....And the SURVEY SAID?: 

20 posted on 09/16/2002 8:02:25 AM PDT by webboss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: webboss
But if it's exactly 13 minutes past the hour here, then it's exactly 13 minutes past the hour everywhere on Earth.

24 posted on 09/16/2002 8:12:05 AM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: webboss
This experiment is not breaking the speed of light. They are using mulitple pulses that travel back and forth on a wave guide that sets up an interference pattern with a pattern where the main bump "moves" faster than light. It actually is not moving at all, it was always there.
29 posted on 09/16/2002 8:18:28 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: webboss
Doesn't Einstein's theory imply that if something travels faster than the speed of light, it would travel backward in time?

Einstein’s theory often predate quantum mechanics and thusly quantum mechanics will cause "discrepancies" with standard Einsteinion physics. And thus very small amounts of matter and/or energy may react in very odd ways, see Schrodinger's cat. Also in the most extreme situations of quantum mechanics cause and effect are not clear and it can appear that cause fallows effect.

31 posted on 09/16/2002 8:20:05 AM PDT by Sinner6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: webboss
Just think of all the bounced e-mail !!


37 posted on 09/16/2002 8:27:46 AM PDT by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: webboss
Ohhh, that reminds me.

On the bulletin board in our university computer lab was an article that reported the evaluation of the speed characteristics of a new type of transistor logic. (This was in the 1960s, mind you, when you had to submit everything on punched cards and get the results back the next day on wide printout paper.)

They discovered that over a certain range, the propagation time through a basic gate was an inverse function of the supply voltage. This was shown in a graph.

They then extrapolated to a much higher supply voltage, at which time the prop time was extrapolated to go to zero, and then negative.

They reported that they measured the logic at this new, much higher, supply voltage level, and began to see output states on the test gates that could not be correlated with any stimuli except those which they were about to apply.

And the gap continued to widen. Pretty soon, they were getting outputs from the test gates from inputs that were to be applied the next day.

Things continued to get more confusing for weeks, until they finally received printouts in their inboxes that were undecipherable, until they realized that these were from programs that were yet to be written, on a machine that was yet to be built, using their newfound ultraspeed logic.

95 posted on 09/16/2002 4:17:35 PM PDT by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson