Plea deal 'minutes away' when body found

San Diego Union Tribune ^ | September 17, 2002 | J. Harry Jones

[Amore]

No, unfortunately you are mistaken. They were not "DU types." There were several long-standing (1998) respectable Freepers defending DW. This case has damaged a lot of relationships on FR. It's been painful to watch (& be involved in).

[Illbay]

--ing BRILLIANT!!!

[EllaMinnow]

So do you believe it or not?

I don't remember ever seeing anything about a plea bargain deal on your "Free Stealth Ninja Dave" fansite.

[VRWC_minion]

I assure you, there are "true believers" in Westerfield's innocence

who would call Westerfield a liar if he admited it and produced a video of the murder to back him up.

[xJones]

He would tell police where he dumped the 7-year-old girl's body; they would not seek the death penalty.

Case closed, justice was served.

[VRWC_minion]

I missed those threads wherein some DU types

Not DU'ers. Some are FR finest.

[Kevin Curry]

Well, you just have to figure he was innocent, Illbay. He had kiddie porn on his home computer, and everyone knows kiddie porn voyeurs are harmless. Only vile lying statists would "see" a connection between kiddie porn and the actual sexual abuse and murder of a child. They invent these false connections to justify suffocating the legitimate freedoms of all of us.

The destruction of the Constitution continues apace. *Sigh*

[Cultural Jihad]

I have no idea what would constitute the 'finest' in anyone's mind. There are many old timers here I would consider borderline mentally ill and definitely America-haters. There are occasional cases in the news which surface wherein they'll scramble to pin the blame upon society, or law enforcement. As such they are no different from whiney liberals with their whiney cop-outs.

[Kevin Curry]

who would call Westerfield a liar if he admited it and produced a video of the murder to back him up.

Perjury? Guilty. Child sexual abuse and murder? Innocent.

I believe you are correct in your assessment.

[Illbay]

Not "painful" for me. I've relished every minute of it.

When you asked them some honest questions, without first uttering the holy mantra "David is innocent, and God will avenge him!" you were attacked mercilessly.

They began to descend into a sort of shorthand in their conversations that took them further and further out of the realm of reality and into their own little universe "through the looking glass."

No, these weren't "long-standing respectable Freepers," it was the same bunch of conspiracy mongers and navel-gazers that we're only able to rid ourselves of when something hit the fan, like Buchanan pulling 0.4% of the popular vote (we were relieved of the burden of a great number of really nasty Brigadiers at that time).

[Illbay]

I think that the saddest aspect of this whole episode is that it appeared that Westerfield's support was engendered SOLELY because someone said, that his brother said, that Westerfield was a conservative Republican.

I mean, if that was the fundamental basis for his support among the throng of rowdies that infested those threads, I say that's just as evil as the support for Bill Clinton's many crimes by the feminists, etc., because he supported abortion.

[Roscoe]

Only vile lying statists would "see" a connection between kiddie porn and the actual sexual abuse and murder of a child. They invent these false connections to justify suffocating the legitimate freedoms of all of us.

It's UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!

[Jaded]

Not really, it appeared in print so what? Now the media is without sin?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/649597/posts?page=322#322

Here's the one I posted in March, post 322. Mine is from the wife of a SD cop who participated in the arrest festivities outside of Feldman's office.

My question remains, why is it more credible now?

[It's me]

Well, obviously, all the questions that I had about inconsistencies have evaporated into thin air. Westerfield obviouly did this heinous crime and, as I said before, if he did it he should get a death more horrible than injection.

[CW_Conservative]

I don't believe everything I read, especially not when it comes from the likes of Doug Pierce and jameson.

So you only believe what an anonymous source tells a reporter? Well, I assume that is exactly the kind of idiotic response the media and law enforcement expected.

Here in LA, the news keeps repeating the femi-male juror's comment about how "silly" he thought the idea of the VD's lifestyle having anything to do with the murder was.

That's the message we are supposed to learn. Suspect all your neighbors, trust noboby, except government agencies and fellow "swingers", if you can remember their names. Might be helpful when unidentified fingerprints and blood are found in your home.

Remember, don't let that "buggy" evidence bother you, the government would never do anything wrong or illegal. Trust us, we never would have you convict an innocent man, on live national TV.

[Cultural Jihad]

... Westerfield's support was engendered SOLELY because someone said, that his brother said, that Westerfield was a conservative Republican.

I can't believe that was the reason for their irrational support of him, Illbay. People who laud and defend sociopaths are not Republicans. There were drugs and promiscuous sex and child porn involved in this case.

[VRWC_minion]

My question remains, why is it more credible now?

Because its sourced in a paper that could be held accountable rather than an anon person in internet.

[Amore]

My guess is it's more credible now because:
now that both portions of the trial are over, and
now that the appellate court has ruled certain matters could not be sealed,
the information is free to come out whereas before it fell under the gag order and/or matters sealed by Judge Mudd.

[It's me]

They ignored Danielle's blood on the wall behind the bed, Danielle's blood on Westerfield's bedding, Danielle's blood on Westerfield's jacket........

Look, I already said I was terribly wrong with my questions. I wasn't totally sold either way. Now obviously, I know undoubtedly.

BUT, let's get it right: the blood spots were on the jacket and on the carpet under a towel, NOT on Westerfield's bedding and the wall behind his bed.

[jlogajan]

There were drugs and promiscuous sex and child porn involved in this case.

And HETEROSEXUALS! They should be banned. :-)