Posted on 09/18/2002 5:29:57 AM PDT by SJackson
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:47:08 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
On the eve of the Gulf War, a young Marine named Scott Ritter wanted to quit. But when President George H.W. Bush began dispatching troops to the Persian Gulf, Mr. Ritter changed his mind. "I can't leave the Marine Corps when my country's getting ready to go to war," he said later. "That's a dishonorable thing to do."
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Horse hockey. Matter of fact, the day before yesterday, Ritter slammed Saddam as a tyrant and said he deserved to be dead.
Y'know, the way the White House's flying monkeys are being sent out to attack this guy says more about the president, than Ritter. And the monkeys are sounding more shrill and more aggressive every day. Playing the man, and not the ball. It's all very Carvillesque.
Doesn't he look good in his new military uniform?
You either a very much uninformed or you are spouting off your agenda. I think once you read up on this matter, you will find the horse excrement to be in your statements.
Okay, well I'll take that on board. We haven't got TV so I haven't seen his demeanour. But there's no way he's running PR for Saddam. Ritter described him as a tyrant, who would be better off dead, in an interview posted here earlier this week.
You think that just because he once said something bad about Saddam, that it means he is not on the Iraqui payroll. You, my friend, are quite easily fooled if that's all it takes.
Just for the record, who are the White House's flying monkeys? Thanks.
Beware.
...and you, my friend, have completely missed the point.
Here's what the article said:
...Scott Ritter is seemingly doing P.R. for Saddam Hussein...
And here's what Ritter said only two days ago:
...Saddam Hussein is the most brutal dictator I can think of today and from my lips to God's ear, I wish he was dead...
So where's the PR, Cap? I mean, let's keep some connection with fact and reality, please. Or do we just run whichever way the lynch mob wants us to?
Unfortunately, yes. I've been trying to figure out this Ritter puzzle for some time now, Byron. I don't believe he's a traitor. Please continue to dig at the truth. Thanks.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/752420/posts
Let me make myself perfectly clear, if Iraq acts in an aggressive manner against one of its neighbours, launching an unprovoked attack against the territory of a sovereign state and if Iraq continues to possess weapons of mass destruction more than 10 years after the international community banned these weapons or if Iraq was any way involved in the attacks against the United States on September 11 of last year, then I would fully concur with those who said that Iraq is a rogue nation that represents a clear and present risk to international peace and security that must be dealt with harshly. Indeed, I would volunteer my services in such a struggle.
I've seen some lousy Photoshop efforts in my time, but that takes the cake. Proves Strange Cosmos is over-rated, if there was ever any doubt. Regards, By.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.