I hate to be the one to break it to you, but they both are taking us in the same direction. One just drives a little faster than the other, that's all.
For the last 5 presidential elections there have been a multitude of 3rd parties running candidates at every level. Tell me, how long does it take to get the message that 3rd parties are a non-starter except as spoilers?
So, which is it? The fast one or the slow one? Or, are you just going to sit this one out and vote 3rd? 3rd drives nowhere because 3rd can't get elected. This is an election to put people in office. Only a winner gets in office and does something, the others just fade away to try again in another 2 years.
We need help now to prevent the damage democrat controlled positions can cause. If they are in office, they will put their stamp all over every piece of legislation that is passed, every decision on judges that is made, and use every opportunity to move forward a little more by the following election.
If they do not get elected, it means that they do not get to more forward in all those areas until the next election when they can get some pawns in place.
I hate to be the one to break it to you but the pols of both parties, from the primaries to the general election, are elected by the people. Thus the pols aren't taking us anywhere that we -- the people -- don't want to be.
The R party has the greatest concentration of freedom loving people. That's why I choose to stay and vote in the R party. Our point of view has more power when concentrated and NOT dispersed over third parties.