[PatrickHenry]

The article is a re-hash of an idea that's been around for a number of years. And it's not that well written, like so much of science journalism. Not much new here. And if I'm not mistaken, there's still no verifiable evidence for the existence of wormholes.

[RightWhale]

there's still no verifiable evidence for the existence of wormholes.

No, still just something that falls out of the equations.