Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: weikel
Serious as root canal. The 13th was "legislating through amendment", an issue that had already been decided by armed conflict and thus, IMHO, unnecessary. Congress did not need to amend the Constitution since there is no mention of its legality as a practice (notwithstanding Art. I, sec. 2 & sec. 9) in the document.
52 posted on 09/24/2002 3:14:57 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: LisaFab
The 13th was neccasary the slaves in areas under Union control could not constitutionally be freed by Lincoln. Besides Im still hoping jury duty gets ruled unconstitutional under the 13th( it is).
53 posted on 09/24/2002 3:18:18 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson