Skip to comments.
Heston puzzles GOP, backs Siegelman
Mobile Register ^
| 09/22/2002
| BRENDAN KIRBY
Posted on 09/24/2002 4:52:46 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
1
posted on
09/24/2002 4:52:46 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
The NRA's policy is that, if there is a tie in the candidates' rankings, to endorse the incumbent.
2
posted on
09/24/2002 4:53:52 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Poohbah
I'm waiting....
To: Poohbah
I remember a few years ago, John Walsh came to Alabama and endorsed Dim Bud Cramer over the Republican opponent.
To: anniegetyourgun
Waiting for what?
The NRA is not a Republican organization, they are a gun-owners' organization.
5
posted on
09/24/2002 5:18:51 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
To: Poohbah
Yes, I'm well aware of that.
To: Pokey78
But he also left something valuable for Democratic Gov. Don Siegelman -- an endorsement. Chuck Heston signed up 2001-04-19.
This account has been banned.
7
posted on
09/24/2002 5:28:42 PM PDT
by
VadeRetro
To: VadeRetro
Excellent!
8
posted on
09/24/2002 5:30:26 PM PDT
by
dpa5923
To: VadeRetro
Chuck Heston signed up 2001-04-19. This account has been banned.
What does this mean?
To: zcat
To: Pokey78
Well, I'm an Alabamian and an NRA member, and sorry Chuck, but I'm voting for Riley. Or to put in another way, I'll vote for a Yaller Dog 'fore I vote for Siegelmann.
To: Pokey78; Lazamataz; Dog Gone; Nick Danger; Travis McGee
Heston's personal endorsement for Seigelman (while campaigning for Riley and other GOP'ers here in 'Bama) is yet one more sign that Democrats are giving up on their gun-control assault (for now).
And the endorsement is a two-edged sword. The NRA can now point to a Democratic governor who relishes his Chuck Heston endorsement, something that can be tossed at any rogue liberal anytime the NRA gets bad press from some desperate Democrat.
12
posted on
09/24/2002 5:54:40 PM PDT
by
Southack
To: Southack
Heston's personal endorsement for Seigelman (while campaigning for Riley and other GOP'ers here in 'Bama) is yet one more sign that Democrats are giving up on their gun-control assault (for now).Yeah, down there. Up here we are staring square at a Blagojevich governorship and a clean sweep of nearly all statewide positions by Dems.
Can you say "California"?
To: VadeRetro
good one.
To: Lazamataz
You Yanks are tough to figure out. Why the affinity for Democrats? It's not like the Democrats have come to the table with a single big idea since Hillary's 1993 Healthcare nationalization fiasco.
At least down here in the South - Democrats have some Rebel, state's rights champions (or pretenders) amongst their ranks to justify a perverted "vote for my state" sort of attitude, but up North, I just don't see even that sort of flimsy excuse to vote for them.
But then again, the national affinity for Democrats has always perplexed me. Democrats are pro-abortion, yet Catholics like them. Democrats favor racial quotas (ala Affirmative Action) and oppose school-choice vouchers, yet minorities stuck in lousy school districts like them. Democrats love the UN as well as national minimum wage laws, yet "State's Rights" supporters seem to like them. Democrats oppose creating new jobs by drilling in the ANWR, yet unions like them. Democrats kiss Yassir Arafat's wife yet many Jews like them.
It boggles the mind...
15
posted on
09/24/2002 6:19:35 PM PDT
by
Southack
To: VadeRetro
Heston has violated FR policy.
Other than posting a link to Jim Robinson's comment to Torque, you still haven't given me a detailed answer, in your own words, to my question.
To: Alas Babylon!
Or to put in another way, I'll vote for a Yaller Dog 'fore I vote for Siegelmann. That's fine, as long as that Yellow Dog isn't a gun grabber. :). The issues are different in a state governors race than they would be in Presidential or federal Congressional one. There, especially in Congress due to the rules giving the majority party control of assignments and the agenda, and the case of the Senate, the judicial nomination process, there are other considerations than a single canidates position on the issues.
17
posted on
09/24/2002 6:29:27 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: VadeRetro
Remind me always to stay on your good side :-)
18
posted on
09/24/2002 6:31:02 PM PDT
by
tictoc
To: zcat
What exactly are you confused about?
To: Southack
IMHO the NRA really screwed up with this, and I called NRA-ILA and told them so today. If they were going to endorse Singleterm, Heston should NOT have been stumping for Riley last week. Makes NRA look foolish...my exact words to the NRA person I talked to. Also mentioned that Singleterm is a weasel...she didn't really give a crap.
20
posted on
09/24/2002 6:57:05 PM PDT
by
6ppc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson