Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air-powered Autos (Star Trek Technology - A Car That Breathes Air, Just Like You Do. Unbelievable.)
MIT Technology Review ^ | September 19, 2002 | John Harney

Posted on 09/25/2002 8:34:47 AM PDT by jstone78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Forget electric cars, hydrogen-powered cars, Solar Cars, and other experimental "clean" technologies from the last century.

This is the real deal. A technology that relies on air pressure, just like your bike pump. This technology is out of this world. You heard it here first!

1 posted on 09/25/2002 8:34:47 AM PDT by jstone78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jstone78
The French have invented the automotive soufle
2 posted on 09/25/2002 8:36:48 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
This is the real deal.

BS. (Oh, and already been posted, find that thread.)

3 posted on 09/25/2002 8:38:27 AM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
It will work however compressing and cooling air does not come cheap in energy terms. As you compress air it gets hot. That heat, for this application must be removed. All of this requires copious amounts of energy. Now the upside of this is that the energy COULD come from some non-or low polluting sources. I would have to learn more about the energy efficiency of the compressor, cooling system, running motor. The exhaust would be clean at least that part is true.
4 posted on 09/25/2002 8:43:16 AM PDT by Wurlitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
Yeah, but what about the World's dwindling supply of air. There is no way the greens are going to let us use the air in Alaska either.
5 posted on 09/25/2002 8:43:32 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: jstone78
Speaking of technology: Is anyone else having trouble with FR being slow and not showing pages for the last couple of days....or is it just me?
7 posted on 09/25/2002 8:45:11 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
Guy Negre

Hey, this guy's name offends me!
8 posted on 09/25/2002 8:45:40 AM PDT by MTRatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
LOLOL. You alternative technology guys keep me in stitches.

Where is the energy to compress and cool that air going to come from? The energy fairy?

120 miles at 30 mph? It just keeps getting funnier!

9 posted on 09/25/2002 8:48:37 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
Obviously, the vehicle also drastically reduces pollution...

WRONG. It moves it from the auto tailpipe to the power company smokestack. There may be advantages to doing that, but it's by no means a freebie.

And what happens when you get in a wreck with four air tanks pressurized at 4500 PSI?

BLAMMO.

10 posted on 09/25/2002 8:49:27 AM PDT by Oberon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
The big question is can it compete with gasoline powered cars. I can think of 100's of ways to power a car - but not at the price of gasoline.
11 posted on 09/25/2002 8:49:52 AM PDT by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer
It will work however compressing and cooling air does not come cheap in energy terms. As you compress air it gets hot. That heat, for this application must be removed. All of this requires copious amounts of energy. Now the upside of this is that the energy COULD come from some non-or low polluting sources. I would have to learn more about the energy efficiency of the compressor, cooling system, running motor. The exhaust would be clean at least that part is true.

Those are two big plusses.

12 posted on 09/25/2002 8:49:56 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
bump
13 posted on 09/25/2002 8:51:35 AM PDT by Kaafi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
"Those are two big plusses"

Absolutely! That is why I did not dismiss the concept out of hand. The energy required to do what I listed must be evaluated. My feeling, knowing how much my company pays to run the plants air compressors is that the energy economics will fail. If I am wrong then great we have an alternative for a limited application. Nothing wrong with that but, I would not invest my money in the concept at this point.

14 posted on 09/25/2002 8:55:01 AM PDT by Wurlitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
it takes four hours using a household electric outlet . . .0.

So, basically it's a coal powered car? (OK, in France it would be nuke powered.)

15 posted on 09/25/2002 8:55:07 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
--next will be leprechauns running on treadmills, sipping on nectar for an energy source--
16 posted on 09/25/2002 8:55:33 AM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: BeDaHed
Two of the tanks would be charged with high-pressure air that would drive the pistons. As the car was moving the other two tanks would be charged and this process would continue driving the car for as long as you wished.

Heh heh, classic perpetual motion scam. The frictional, compression and decompression inefficiencies are rather large. Sorry, this concept won't work.

18 posted on 09/25/2002 9:03:52 AM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
"explains that, in the tanks, the air is both cooled to minus 100 degrees Centigrade and compressed to 4,500 pounds per square inch.

OUCH! We have to carry a tank full of 4500psi tank of air? Imagine how high that would blow that 1500lb car with its occupants when it ruptures in a wreck.

A partially filled scuba tank will tear the rear end completely off of a car when it lets loose. This thing is a virtual bomb!

19 posted on 09/25/2002 9:06:37 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jstone78
This is the real deal.

Sure it is.

Now, turn on the heater in snow country or the air conditioner in the summer. Oops, 0-to-30 in 15 minutes and only a 30 minute supply of air. Whadda ya mean, no air conditioning? No stereo? And, how long can you run the lights at night??

Now, take that jockey sized driver out and remove those bicycle seats, add in some real seats and padding, put in two fat broads, a brood of kids, and a s*$tload of groceries. 0-to-15 in 30 minutes, a two mile range, and a hazard to everybody else on the road.

And what happens when it runs out of air on the road? Anybody got a $100,000 hyper-compression air station near their gas pumps?

Or when it springs a leak from those overstressed seals in the pneumatic systems? Tow it to where, lady? The junk yard? Okay!

And, finally, is anybody willing to insure this deathtrap?

Good luck, you'll need it.

20 posted on 09/25/2002 9:06:54 AM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson