Posted on 09/26/2002 10:22:52 AM PDT by I still care
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:09:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
AL Gore's speech attacking Bush over Iraq is the absolute low point in his increasingly bad political instincts. Challenging Bush on terror is like going after Clinton on the economy or Reagan on taxes.
Only in the past week have Democratic Party leaders come to grasp the magnitude of their error in challenging Bush on Iraq so close to the fall midterm elections. As the tracking polls have come in during the past 10 days, party leaders have realized that they have allowed Bush to change the subject from the economy and corporate greed to Iraq, with potentially lethal consequences for them in the congressional elections. But Gore didn't get the message.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
It's pretty clear now that the "Clinton Economy" was smoke and mirrors. And "the surplus" never existed, except in Clinton's misbegotten dreams...
The more the Iraqi dictator roars against the legitimacy of the U.S.-led invasion of his country, the more he drives the topic to the top of the national agenda - exactly what Bush wants and needs politically.
Is he saying they do work in concert and or is advocating for them a strategy?
Dick Morris-often wrong but never in doubt. - Tom
Well, Reagan and Bush 41 were president in the 80's, and they're Republicans, and of course, everybody knows that the Republicans are greedy, I mean Julia Roberts and Barbra Streisand say so, but Clintoon was president during the 90's and he was so compassionate and felt people's pain and saved abortion and was the victim of a vicious right wing conspiracy. So that's why.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.