Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StolarStorm
Ahhh. but the music doesn't COST 35 cents to make... only to reproduce. The costs include studio expenses, royalties, promotion and much more. Granted, I do think that the record companies should drastically reduce the price they charge for music and sell it online. 16 bucks for a CD is absurd.

I read the article in PC-Magazine last night, and I disagree with Dvorak. Why should the royalties be a proportion of the manufacturing costs? Digital technologies are driving the marginal costs toward zero. What does it cost to download professionally made MP3 files and burn them onto a CD-ROM or DVD-ROM? If royalties should be proportional to the manufacturing cost, they also will go to zero!

14 posted on 09/27/2002 6:43:41 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative
I remember when they were debating cost of CD's in our GLORIOUS capital. I heard several big name stars claim that the first thing the customer would do is make a copy of the CD on tape. So our bright arse legislators along with the "MUSICindustry" lobbiest alowed then to charge YOU for 2 copies of the CD. Why the heck do you think it cost $16. The game was rigged in the early 90's, there is a LOT of catching up to do. Download your heart out, you allready paid for it.
15 posted on 09/27/2002 7:00:15 PM PDT by Winston Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson