Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StolarStorm
"Ahhh. but the music doesn't COST 35 cents to make... only to reproduce."

Perfect point, SS. I know a lot of excellent musicians who work their buns off to put out a good sound and get very little for it. One that I know is not only an accomplished artist, but a good organizer as well. It cost her over $30,000 to put out her first CD. She got about $1.00 per copy out of the $16 the distribution system sold it for.

I can see both sides of the argument. Like what happens all too often in our system, it just looks like the producer is the one getting screwed, again.

7 posted on 09/27/2002 5:02:23 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: nightdriver
Which is probably why some create their own record labels and cut out the middle-man, in true capitalist fashion.
11 posted on 09/27/2002 5:30:51 PM PDT by thescourged1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: nightdriver
I agree.

At first, I thought this might be an interesting economic perspective on the issue -- but you're right, the writer only takes into account the cost of a CD and reproduction.

And, as for making a Lexus (or whatever brand it was) for $1000, I think that patent infringement would come into play.

It's still just stealing.

I don't know what the recording industry should do to combat it. Maybe there's a germ of truth here that the price of a CD will have to drop -- with the necessary drop in the price of talent.

I don't like, myself, the suggested solutions of examining everyone's computer. Hope there's a better (and still capitalistic) way.

12 posted on 09/27/2002 5:37:17 PM PDT by BfloGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson