Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TERMINATTOR
I used the phrase, 'public armory,' to refer to arms already secured by the people -- those not stored in national guard armories. The national guard armories are not public. However, I would expect if there were extra weapons stored there, they would be issued to the sheriff who would distribute them. Wouldn't want any one lacking a weapon for lack of the price of one. "For lack of a nail, the kingdom was lost,'" seems to fit.

But that was only a side-bar to my topic. Any comment on the logic of the main topic? Thanks for the reply, TERMINATTOR.

23 posted on 09/29/2002 5:56:32 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Eastbound; humblegunner; Eaker; antivenom; dix
I may melt mine down, but it will be from putting too many rounds through it when someone tries to confiscate it!


24 posted on 09/29/2002 7:35:51 PM PDT by COB1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Eastbound
You got it right! The RKBA is an inalienable right, end of story. Anything, anyone, anytime. The sad fact is OUR government thinks they have the right to RKBA as they see fit, and we don't. They've got it exactly bass akwards!

Molon Labe!

26 posted on 09/29/2002 7:50:07 PM PDT by TERMINATTOR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson