Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Torch, resignation and... THE LAW
NJ Statutes | CJ Barr

Posted on 09/30/2002 12:58:59 PM PDT by FlameThrower

19:3-26.  Vacancies in United States senate;  election to fill; temporary appointment by governor
    If a vacancy shall happen in the representation of this state in the United  States senate, it shall be filled at the general election next succeeding the  happening thereof, unless such vacancy shall happen within thirty days next  preceding such election, in which case it shall be filled by election at the  second succeeding general election, unless the governor of this state shall  deem it advisable to call a special election therefor, which he is authorized  hereby to do.

    The governor of this state may make a temporary appointment of a senator of  the United States from this state whenever a vacancy shall occur by reason of  any cause other than the expiration of the term;  and such appointee shall serve as such senator until a special election or general election shall have been held pursuant to law and the board of state canvassers can deliver to his successor a certificate of election.
  ************************************

The NJ Dems cannot appoint a new candidate within 48 days of the election by State law. So the strategy will be to use the foregoing provision to accomplish the same thing. But does it work?

No.

If Torch resigns from the Senate now, more than 30 days from the election, then the election to fill the term shall be held at that general election. If he waits, then the election to fill the term shall be held two years from now.

NOTE that the election to be held is to fill the term, not to elect the a Senator for the upcoming term. The Torch's term expires in January 2003. If the Dems want to hold an election to fill the seat between the election and a month or so following, let them! The Republicans are waging an election to fill the six year term that starts in January 2003. They will be unopposed.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: torch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: cinFLA
If he resigns after 30 days prior then his appointment can serve for the next two years.

Not true. Others explained it on this thread.

21 posted on 09/30/2002 1:33:40 PM PDT by On the Road to Serfdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
"This is completely irrelevant. Toricelli is not considering resigning from the Senate. He is considering resigning his candidacy - so that the Democratic Party can name a new candidate for the Nov. election to replace him in Jan. "

According to Fox news he is considering resigning. But his replacemanet could only serve until the end of Torches term.

What about this??? Torch announces that he considered resigning and not running, however, he has realized that this would be the cowards way. He has decided to run and pleads with the N.J. voters to reelect him and clear his name which has been besmerched by his evil republican opponent. Then he states that if he is elected, it will exonerate him completly and he will resign as soon as he is sworn in for his next term... The N.J. voters can vote for Torch knowing it will be a vote for someone that will be appointed by the democrat governor of N.J. Kinda like voting for a dead man but really voting for his wife.

22 posted on 09/30/2002 1:40:46 PM PDT by lstanle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TONIGHT.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

23 posted on 09/30/2002 1:41:06 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
First, Torch will withdraw from the election. If the courts do not allow replacement on the ballot, I expect he will then choose door number two and resign.

I think you are correct. He won't resign unless he has to--but he will resign if he must.

24 posted on 09/30/2002 1:48:33 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lstanle
What about this??? Torch announces that he considered resigning and not running, however, he has realized that this would be the cowards way. He has decided to run and pleads with the N.J. voters to reelect him and clear his name which has been besmerched by his evil republican opponent. Then he states that if he is elected, it will exonerate him completly and he will resign as soon as he is sworn in for his next term... The N.J. voters can vote for Torch knowing it will be a vote for someone that will be appointed by the democrat governor of N.J. Kinda like voting for a dead man but really voting for his wife.

Even New Jersey Democrats are not dumb enough to fall for this. ;-) The Torch's "word" is not worth a whole lot right now.

25 posted on 09/30/2002 1:50:28 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa
I was afraid you would say that.

McGreevey is a Catholic who tossed a Catholic priest out of a Catholic school on St Patrick's Day (during his bid for Governor).

And when I say the Catholic priest was tossed from the building, he was forcibly "pushed out".

26 posted on 09/30/2002 1:58:55 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
That would be a sin.
27 posted on 09/30/2002 2:01:49 PM PDT by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 3AngelaD
The Republicans would surely not allow any vote to seat a temporary candidate to take place until after the election - so the dem wouldn't be an incumbent senator against an outside Republican candidate.
28 posted on 09/30/2002 2:12:28 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
So what? Who cares what the law says? Laws are for the little people.

Can any New Jersey Freepers tell us whether the New Jersey Supreme Court is packed with democRATs who will pull a Florida Supreme Court and ignore the law?

29 posted on 09/30/2002 2:19:07 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
State law cannot trump the US Constitution. The Constitution is "the supreme Law" as it says in its text. Per the Constitution, a Governor of any state can appoint someone to take the position of a deceased, resigned, jailed, Senator, but not to exceed two years, when there must be another election.

But this applies only to the extent that the Senator who goes back to the Mother Ship by whatever means has time left on his, her term. Torricelli's term is almost up.

The only route to get someone other than Torricelli on the ballot now to replace him as a candidate, will be a New Jersey court decision that violates NJ law. However, there are plenty of hard-wired Democrat judges in NJ. So I think the Forrester Campaign has to prepare for exactly that possibility.

Assuming a "new" Democrat gets on the ballot, he/she can be charged with "cheating" from the get-go, because of the manner of getting on the ballot. After all, the charges against Robert ("the Public Official") Torricelli have been around for years. If the Democrats did not want the legal consequences of his last-minute resignation as a candidate, they should not have supported him so whole-heartly up until Sunday night.

My column this week is SQUARELY on point, "Death as a Political Strategy." Use the third link below.

Congressman Billybob

Click for "Til Death Do Us Part."

Click for "to Restore Trust in America"

Click for "Death as a Political Strategy"

30 posted on 09/30/2002 2:20:45 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
If the election is podtponed can the GOP sue to recover funds spent on campaigning to date ???????
31 posted on 09/30/2002 2:23:34 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
Let's say the Dems appoint Congressman X to fill the unexpired term of the Torch. This person would have to stand for election in November -- for the two month term!. so the Republicans oppose him and win. the senate would change hands in November! They'd have been better off with the Torch.
32 posted on 09/30/2002 2:25:44 PM PDT by FlameThrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Congressman Billybob, did he not just concede the race? Wouldn't that make the winner the Republican candidate?

Jen
33 posted on 09/30/2002 2:43:35 PM PDT by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
This could be a great time for an independent to step in. Maybe a write in candidate. I dunno, the law looks a little vague to me on this one, and that's what the RATS want.


34 posted on 09/30/2002 2:51:47 PM PDT by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: On the Road to Serfdom
Not true. Others explained it on this thread.

I believe Napolitano more.

35 posted on 09/30/2002 2:53:08 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lstanle
From the first line of this thread:

"If a vacancy shall happen in the representation of this state in the United States senate, it shall be filled at the general election next succeeding the happening thereof, unless such vacancy shall happen within thirty days next preceding such election, in which case it shall be filled by election at the second succeeding general election, unless the governor of this state shall deem it advisable to call a special election therefor, which he is authorized hereby to do."
36 posted on 09/30/2002 2:54:36 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaisersrsic
I agree with you---"term" should not be confused with "vacancy."

Just because Torch is off the ballot does not mean there is, yet, a vacancy. He has not resigned from the Senate. Basically, his former opponent is running unopposed at the moment.

Although if you can vote for a dead man, I suppose you could vote for a man who's not running.
37 posted on 09/30/2002 3:06:48 PM PDT by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
I have not researched the following, but found it on the live thread on this topic.

Here is an email from the NRSC General Counsel:

September 30, 2002 To: Senator Frist, Mitch Bainwol

From: Alex N. Vogel General Counsel

Re: New Jersey – Ballot Substitution

You have asked for an analysis of New Jersey ballot statutes and regulations regarding a possible vacancy in connection with the upcoming election in New Jersey. New Jersey law explicitly provides that when a vacancy occurs among primary nominees, the state committee of a political party committee may select a replacement candidate. N.J. Stat. § 19:13-20. However, this ballot replacement is only allowed when the vacancy occurs more than 51 days prior to the election. Id. Inside of this 51 day statutory window, a replacement candidate can not be put on the ballot. The only exception ever recognized by a New Jersey court was in the case of the death of a nominee. Petition of Koegh-Dwyer, 106 N.J. Super. 567, 256 A.2d 314 (1969), affirmed 54 N.J. 523, 257 A.2d 697. It is worth noting that the time limit was raised from 34 days to 51 days in 1985. Legislative history from the original statute states that time limit was included "to afford election official sufficient time in which to attend mechanics of preparing for general election." Kilmurray v. Gilfert, 10 N.J. 435, 91 A.2d 865 (1952).

38 posted on 09/30/2002 3:08:38 PM PDT by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Okay, this is rather confusing, but here is what I can discern from all of these threads...

If the Torch had another 4 years to serve on his term, and resigned, the governor could appoint a replacement to serve in his stead. At the next general election, candidates would run to fill the unexpired term of office. If the resignation took place within 30 days of the next general election, the appointee would fill the post until the next general election (which may be a year or two years... it has to be a statewide election.)

In this example, if the Torch still had 4 years to serve, and resigned today, the governor would appoint someone to serve until the end of this year, and the election would proceed as scheduled, with the new senator on the ballot, presumably. The winner of the election would serve the remaining 4 years. If he waited for two weeks before resigning, then the appointee would serve for a year or two before the position was up for election. THe winner of that election would then serve the remaining two years of the term.

The key factor here is that the Torch's term expires in January. The governor CANNOT appoint someone to serve into the next term... he doesn't have the authority. That is not an issue of NJ state law, it is a matter of the US Constitution... Senate terms cannot exceed 6 years. So there MUST be an election November 5th to determine the person who will serve the next term as NJ Senator. The only question is who the candidate will be.

39 posted on 09/30/2002 4:01:23 PM PDT by CA Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FlameThrower
Wrong Law. This law concerns vacancies IN THE SENATE. The law you want is this...

Memorandum from the National Republican Senatorial Committee General Counsel.

From: Alex N. Vogel, General Counsel
Re: New Jersey – Ballot Substitution

You have asked for an analysis of New Jersey ballot statutes and regulations regarding a possible vacancy in connection with the upcoming election in New Jersey. New Jersey law explicitly provides that when a vacancy occurs among primary nominees, the state committee of a political party committee may select a replacement candidate. N.J. Stat. § 19:13-20. However, this ballot replacement is only allowed when the vacancy occurs more than 51 days prior to the election. Id. Inside of this 51 day statutory window, a replacement candidate can not be put on the ballot. The only exception ever recognized by a New Jersey court was in the case of the death of a nominee. Petition of Koegh-Dwyer, 106 N.J. Super. 567, 256 A.2d 314 (1969), affirmed 54 N.J. 523, 257 A.2d 697. It is worth noting that the time limit was raised from 34 days to 51 days in 1985. Legislative history from the original statute states that time limit was included "to afford election official sufficient time in which to attend mechanics of preparing for general election." Kilmurray v. Gilfert, 10 N.J. 435, 91 A.2d 865 (1952).


40 posted on 09/30/2002 4:02:27 PM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson