To: FlameThrower
This is completely irrelevant. Toricelli is not considering resigning from the Senate. He is considering resigning his candidacy - so that the Democratic Party can name a new candidate for the Nov. election to replace him in Jan.
And remember that the N.J. Republican Party pulled similar shenanigans 30 months ago when they substitued Franks for DiFrancesco vs. Shundler in their primary for the 2000 Gubernatorial election (yes, I googled that!).
11 posted on
09/30/2002 1:17:14 PM PDT by
RossA
To: RossA
Heard on Fox the deadline for that kind of maneuver would have been Sept. 16th.
17 posted on
09/30/2002 1:23:17 PM PDT by
dawn53
To: RossA
This is completely irrelevant. Toricelli is not considering resigning from the Senate. He is considering resigning his candidacy - so that the Democratic Party can name a new candidate for the Nov. election to replace him in Jan. Not according to what I see posted. If he resigns after 30 days prior then his appointment can serve for the next two years.
20 posted on
09/30/2002 1:24:42 PM PDT by
cinFLA
To: RossA
Primaries are entirely different from General elections.They are mainly left up to the respective parties and candidates. General elections are mandated by the US constitution. And are therefore horses of a different color.
42 posted on
09/30/2002 4:14:17 PM PDT by
rstevens
To: RossA
Isn't there a more considerable consequence for an election, rather than a primary?
64 posted on
09/30/2002 7:08:47 PM PDT by
JENINMO
To: RossA
It's a lot harder to scam a general election, and primary election law is a bit different. The GOP wont let the Democrats break the law here.
65 posted on
09/30/2002 7:38:10 PM PDT by
WOSG
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson