Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE - New Jersey Supreme Court agrees to take Torricelli successor case directly
Associated Press ^ | 10-1-02 | JOHN P. McALPIN

Posted on 10/01/2002 10:05:59 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:05 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) -- The state Supreme Court decided Tuesday to hear arguments over whether Democrats can replace Sen. Robert Torricelli on the November ballot, a day after the senator abruptly dropped out of the race.

The court issued an order saying it would hear the case directly instead of waiting for a lower court to act. The high court hearing is scheduled for Wednesday morning. As a result, a hearing set for Tuesday afternoon in Middlesex County Superior Court was canceled.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: supremecourt; thetorch; torricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2002 10:06:00 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The fix is in.
2 posted on 10/01/2002 10:06:37 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I bet they "agreed" on Monday.
3 posted on 10/01/2002 10:07:17 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
I smell it too.
4 posted on 10/01/2002 10:09:50 AM PDT by Sgt Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
They wouldn't have pulled this little game if they didn't know how this Kangaroo Court was going to decide in advance. Forrester needs to stay away from this court fight and let the GOP "party hacks" do it for him.

5 posted on 10/01/2002 10:10:14 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Question we SHOULD start asking now: Did McGreevy promise Toricelli there will be no state prosecution of his still- emerging wrongdoing? You can bet on it. Torch is the ultimate arrogant "dealmaker" and he would never have acted so quickly, except to save his own skin.
6 posted on 10/01/2002 10:10:44 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
...prearranged over the weekend...the Rats wouldn't have done this if they weren't already assured that it was in the bag....next stop...SCOTUS.
7 posted on 10/01/2002 10:12:18 AM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I will dissent. I don't think this court is going to rule for Torch. They do not want to be overturned by US Supremes.

Then the question becomes, will the Torch resign?

8 posted on 10/01/2002 10:13:09 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

The fix is in...never mind the law or the horrible new standard this sets in campaigns.

NJ STANDARD:

1) Run a "trojan horse" candidate
2) Dry up your opponent's money and reputation
3) Bring in a "finisher" at the last minute to win the election.

9 posted on 10/01/2002 10:13:56 AM PDT by willgetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Reuters - Sen. Torricelli's Withdrawal Sparks Court Battle
10 posted on 10/01/2002 10:14:44 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
The RATS' initial petition was filed in New Jersey Superior Court in Middlex County, which is the home county of Governor McGreedy and a longtime RAT bastion nothwithstanding a voter profile of ethnic, working class Reagan Democratics.

Anybody know about the political/ideological makeup of the NJ Supreme Court? Is it SCOFLA II?
11 posted on 10/01/2002 10:15:26 AM PDT by nyc.flip.conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak; ambrose
We've been here before. Last time we were innocent; this time we're not.
12 posted on 10/01/2002 10:15:55 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
There's no law on the books that says "I can't win, so I'm going to move aside and let someone else take over."

The Dems are heading for another court ruling that they'll whine and gripe about until the cows come home.
13 posted on 10/01/2002 10:16:26 AM PDT by jerod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
They do not want to be overturned by US Supremes.

If the NJ court's ruling is based on NJ state law, the SCOTUS would have no basis on which to overturn the NJ court ruling.
14 posted on 10/01/2002 10:17:54 AM PDT by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
In another development, Democratic Gov. James E. McGreevey said that if they couldn't have the rules of baseball changed, he was gonna take his ball and bat, and go home.
15 posted on 10/01/2002 10:19:25 AM PDT by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
Plan A and Plan B:

Plan A: try to switch the names on the ballot

Plan B: If Plan A fails in the courts, then: 1) resign from the Senate, 2) Gov. appoints an "annoited" Dem to the seat, 3) election postponed, 4) special election 1 year later.

Any way you look at it, the fix is in and most NJ voters think it's okay. In fact, the mantra quoted by the papers will be:

"I think its great that I now have a real candidate that I can cast a vote for. The right of the voter to have a good candidate to vote for is more important than some arbitrary deadline in the state law."

BTW, I've already seen such talk in NJ websites! LOL

16 posted on 10/01/2002 10:19:58 AM PDT by willgetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Democratic Gov. James E. McGreevey said that placing a new candidate on the ballot would be a fair way to resolve the issue and would "give New Jersey voters a chance to speak."

Egads. What issue is there to resolve? Your candidate is losing. Tough luck. Oh and by the way, the New Jersey voters are speaking, that's why your candidate is trying to get out.

17 posted on 10/01/2002 10:20:52 AM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: willgetsome
Governor has no authority under the Constitution of the United States to extend any senate term. Period.
18 posted on 10/01/2002 10:21:28 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Drango
What's sad is that the Dems know it's wrong, but their attitude will be "paybacks are a b!tch."
19 posted on 10/01/2002 10:21:54 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PMCarey
LOL!

Just wait for the: "we need to protect the rights of NJ voters and give them good choices on the ballots" mantra to really pick up on TV and in the press.

20 posted on 10/01/2002 10:22:33 AM PDT by willgetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson