Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
I think that all those other names put up to replace the Torch were phony, since Lautenberg was the obvious choice from day one. I think they did it to implement plan B, which is to get Torch to resign by next Monday, which he has probably told them he would refuse to do for Lautenberg. Now they can say they tried to find someone else, but all turned them down, so he should play ball. If he resigns, the Dems' case is infinitely stronger. As it is, the Dems don't have a case, and I don't think the NJSC will go for it. Yes, I am going out on a limb, but I just can't see how the Court can do it.
243 posted on 10/01/2002 7:20:14 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
EXACTLY!...this is a week-long stall tactic, they'll lose eventually in the courts, be left with "NO OPTION" but for the torch to "resign" for the good of the party...I wouldn't be suprised if this hadn't been in the works for a week deep in the Clinton's Reichstag...er, sorry bunker in New York...
253 posted on 10/01/2002 7:23:20 PM PDT by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson