Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sam_paine
EVERYBODY WINS!! This is a victory for State's Rights, you know.

Thank you. This issue was not one for the SCOTUS. As much as I dislike the fact that Lautenburg may win in NJ, what the NJ SC decided was the final decision. Are we to expect the national government to step into every internal state issue because we disagree with the decision? That being said, I sure hope Forrester wins

113 posted on 10/07/2002 11:12:43 AM PDT by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: billbears
This issue was not one for the SCOTUS

I'm taking a lot of freepheat for merely saying something that normally people here would support.

166 posted on 10/07/2002 11:27:06 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: billbears
The states need to tighten up the wording of their election laws. One of the arguments NJSC made is that the statute as written in New Jersey is not as tight as the statute in other states.
195 posted on 10/07/2002 11:36:11 AM PDT by sonrise57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson