Posted on 10/07/2002 1:42:41 PM PDT by sourcery
Nope, not quite.
The key is this: Look at the IF filter bandwidth.
A DSSS (direct sequence spread spectrum) system (which CDMA is) literally occupies a bandwwidth as wide as the 'chipping' code - as wide as 1.2 MHz or so for CDMA as used in cellular systems ...
Whereas a FH system has *only* has an IF BW as wide as the data or modulation rate expected ... and the LO is 'frequency hopped' to keep track of the transmitted 'hopped' data ...
There are other differences too, such as a FH system *still* requires a S/N ratio of some 10 to 15 dB or more whereas a CDMA system can have Eb/No (Energy per bit to noise ratio) of just over one ... equivalently a unity S/N ratio ...
All non-coherent 'codes' during recovery (mixing with the original chipping code again, a demodulation process if you will) still results in noise whereas the *desired* signal, when the recovered bit stream is low-pass filtered, will result in the original bit stream ...
I will have to pick nits and note that CDMA is a very specific physical layer solution to the problem of multiple access of the air interface.
Not to get too technical, but compared to TDMA and FDMA, it is a more efficient use of the observation that multiplication in the time domain equals convolution in the frequency domain. This latter fact is the single most important fact behind the old school analog stuff (FM,AM) and most of the modern digital stuff (which is helped out by them fast little chips that crunch the little bits)
How about a strict assignment to either a chipping code or a time slot?
Chipping codes (one of 64 orthogonal Walsh codes if I recall correectly) for a DSSS - CDMA system or a particular time slot for a time division system ...
Of course, each one also requires a frequency during a channel assignment and the TDMA system also sends a time alignment value to correct for distance from the cell site (otherwise your slot starts to overlap into adjacent slots) ...
Is Voicestream's GSM service available nationwide?
I don't know what the latter means. Do you mean the network of base station controllers?
Two-way SMS was introduced in the United States in May 2000 when VoiceStream began to offer the service.458This isn't *quite* correct -As of year-end 2001, the six nationwide mobile telephone carriers, as well as handheld providers and some smaller mobile telephone carriers, were offering SMS.459
At the end of 2001, AT&T Wireless became the first carrier to offer cross-carrier network SMS capabilities.460
A short time later, most of the nationwide carriers announced similar plans.461 Mobile telephone carriers that offer crosscarrier SMS have reported increased traffic since implementing this capability on their networks.
AT&T Wireless stated that it has experienced 29 percent SMS growth from November 2001 through the end of March 2002, while Verizon has reported SMS traffic up to 4 million messages per day.
- I know for a fact that it has been possible to send messages between various phones, PDAs and 2-way wireless pagers for sometime now - IF they had internet e-mail addressability through their various carriers ... we were doing 2-way e-mail messaging via Skytel's 2-way pagers in '98!
It seems they have entered into agreements with at least Cingular to provide some coverage in three states mentioned in the FCC report - they also have a name change coming up, to "T-Mobile" ... since they are the newest PCS provider on the block they are still building-out some parts of their network in areas they won in the spectum auction.
I think you're putting waaaay too much emphasis on these terms - practiaclly speaking it simply indicates the methodology used to attain 'separate' voice or data streams:
And with that - I gotta get outa here!
I think I see your point and we are definitely talking about the same things, but I always assumed that the MA (ie. "multiple access") does stand for the "CD multiplex link format" to which you refer.
Not a very good forum for technical discussions...
I skimmed thru it last night and found it to be very interesting!
And one interesting part of the story is that Hedy Lamarr, besides being the engineer who helped develop spread-spectrum technology, was also a gorgeous movie actress
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.