Who's Davis? That name sorta rings a bell......
I could write a very angry letter right now about Sen. Hillary Clinton, but I decided instead merely to express some constructive criticism. Let me begin by saying that Hillary is intellectually dishonest in everything she says and does. I challenge her to move from her broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. Her advocates are hostile at best, the downfall of society at worst. Likewise, she possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, she can't even spell or define "erudition," much less achieve it. There are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Hillary doing some nit-picky thing every few weeks. Now, I don't want to overwork the story about how she plans to tinker about with a lot of halfway prescriptions, so let's just say that she maintains that either boosterism is the only alternative to barbarism or that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable. Hillary denies any other possibility. She says that the ideas of "freedom" and "voyeurism" are Siamese twins. Yet she also wants to ignore compromise and focus solely on her personal agenda. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask, because mephitic delinquents (like Hillary) are not born -- they are excreted. Lastly, none of Sen. Hillary Clinton's "progressive" ideas have actually resulted in any progress.