Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sniper kills for the thrill: 8th attack leaves teen near death
New York Daily News ^ | 10/08/02 | HELEN KENNEDY

Posted on 10/08/2002 2:00:45 AM PDT by kattracks

WASHINGTON - The thrill killer terrorizing the capital suburbs shot a 13-year-old boy at his schoolhouse entrance yesterday to taunt police hunting for him, experts said.

They suspect the gunman targeted a schoolboy because officials spent all weekend assuring area parents their kids would be safe at school.

The killer's chilling motive was his own amusement.

"This person is killing for sport," said James Fox, dean of Northeastern University's College of Criminal Justice. "He's turned the Montgomery County area into his own personal shooting gallery."

The boy, who let out a cry and dropped his red knapsack as blood erupted on his shirt, became the marksman's eighth and youngest victim moments after his aunt dropped him off at school.

A single .223-caliber bullet from a long hunting rifle smashed into the boy's abdomen at 8:09 a.m., ripping through his pancreas, spleen and part of his left lung. His aunt bundled him into her car and rushed him to a hospital, where he was on a ventilator last night in serious condition.

Relatives said the eighth-grader normally attends a prayer service before classes at the Benjamin Tasker Middle School in Bowie, Md., but missed it yesterday.

No one saw the shooter or the white box truck he is believed to be driving, possibly with a companion.

Judging from an area of matted grass where a police dog sniffed gunfire residue, the maniacal marksman was lying in wait on a wooded hill above the school, watching through his scope as the kids arrived at the entrance 150 yards away.

A tired Montgomery Police Chief Charles Moose could not contain his emotion when faced with a shot child.

'Getting ... personal'

"All of our victims have been innocent and have been defenseless," he said, a tear running down his left cheek. "But it's stepping over the line - shooting a kid. I guess it's getting to be really, really personal now."

Moose and County Executive Doug Duncan had promised Sunday that the schools would be safe, vowing a massive police presence and noting the killer did not appear to have targeted children.

That might have been a mistake.

"They were trying to reassure the mothers and fathers, but the shooter might have seen that to be a challenge," said former FBI profiler Clint Van Zandt.

"He might have thought: 'I'll take it right to where you said was safe to show you that no one and no location is safe.'"

Cops were posted at schools all over Montgomery County - but the shooting took place next door, in Prince George's County, another Washington suburb.

On a positive note, experts noted that the sniper took a greater risk by leaving his getaway car to climb around in the woods. He also may have left behind useful evidence on his grassy knoll - hairs, fibers or other debris.

"He's taking greater chances," said Van Zandt. "It's part of the usual pattern. You start to feel omnipotent. Eventually, he'll make a mistake, and that's how he'll be caught."

Moose called on Attorney General John Ashcroft to send federal help, and Duncan called on parents to help guard school kids this morning.

President Bush, who has monitored the wave of shootings, decried the "cowardly" shootings and issued a statement sending his "thoughts and prayers to the victims and their families."

In a region already traumatized by crashing planes and anthrax letters, the level of panic in the Washington region reached new heights after the lull of a shooting-free weekend.

Schools across the area locked youngsters indoors, parents rushed to take their kids home and pedestrians everywhere looked nervously over their shoulders.

"It's a fearful time," Duncan said. "As I'm leaving the funeral of one victim this morning, I'm getting briefed on this latest event."

The mad marksman began his reign of terror Thursday, picking off six people at random.

On Friday, the sniper shot a woman in a Virginia mall parking lot about 50 miles south of Washington. She was the first to survive, and her condition was upgraded yesterday to fair from serious.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Steve Van Doorn
The shootings are not in affluent areas, nor are they in poor areas.

The shooting in VA and the one of the kid yesterday were both close to interstate highways, on main roads close to interstate exits.

The earlier shootings in MD were on Connecticut Ave., Rockville Pike, Randolph Rd., Georgia Ave., all major roads close to I-495 and I-270, but not as close to the interstate highways as the one in VA and the one of the kid yesterday.

I think the killer is far more familiar with the area of the earlier shootings in MD. He either lives there or works there.

I think the fact that there were no shootings over the weekend is significant. My guess is that he may live with his parents, who were home during the day then, or maybe he has a job that requires him to work during the day on the weekends.
21 posted on 10/08/2002 5:18:31 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; All
We are at war. A war with terrorists, they have been attacking us for over two decades, and since 9/11 it is undeniable. They have trained their warriors in random terror asassinations, they have used random terror asassinations in other countries. We have become their most direct enemy.

Yet, amazingly, even on FR, few see this DC sniping as most likely to be terrorism.

It is by such wooly-eyed denial of a war, that we will dwaddle to our own defense and our enemies will extract more havoc and horror from us and our children.

This is war. This sniping must be considered, first and most likely, to be terrorism.

22 posted on 10/08/2002 5:22:21 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
a serial killer addicted to shooting gallery games

Not sure I buy this theory...the killer seems too patient and organized..."arcade addiction" brings to mind a teenager or young man who is out of touch with reality, he'd be losing it by now. After each success, in order to keep the "thrill" going, the "kills" would get closer together, more risky, but less planned-out...and I would think he would begin to pick off more than one person at each site (more like the arcade games). The fact that he shot the kid, but not the aunt shows extreme discipline (could be he shot the kid and immediately took off). Plus, unless they had a "buddy" who was in strict control, a psycho like this wouldn't be able to keep in what he was doing, he'd have to "brag" to someone about what was going on

23 posted on 10/08/2002 5:22:44 AM PDT by twyn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
I personally have been wondering if it is a terrorist who dreamed up this scenario because he was out of touch with his leadership and frustrated, like the one who shot up LAX.

He is clearly a terrorist,but I don't think he is the style of terrorist you mean. I don't think he has any connection to the middle east. He's a homegrown nutcase. He may even be a gun-control freak doing to to "prove his point".

24 posted on 10/08/2002 5:23:57 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Look at the map. An obvious observation is that he is attacking all around Washington DC but not with in it.

Why would he do that?

To "prove" that gun control works? After all,guns are banned in DC for all but a few elites.

25 posted on 10/08/2002 5:26:16 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
On a positive note, experts noted that the sniper took a greater risk by leaving his getaway car to climb around in the woods. He also may have left behind useful evidence on his grassy knoll - hairs, fibers or other debris.

Important development.

26 posted on 10/08/2002 5:27:37 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This map of the shootings shows how close they were to major roads and interstate highways.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/images/shootings_100702.html

He's out there, driving around, on the interstate highways, looking for more victims. Must have ice cubes in his veins.
27 posted on 10/08/2002 5:27:55 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
My guess is that the reason he is not shooting anyone in DC is that the roads are too congested so he can't make a quick getaway.

All the shootings have been near large roads that are not congested at the time of the shootings.

DC traffic is always congested.
28 posted on 10/08/2002 5:29:55 AM PDT by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RWG
. The killer is alright as long as victims are adults, but one kid and then he goes over the line.

That's the logical result of hearing and speaking all that "hit's fore the chil-run" crap. Women pushing shopping carts don't count,and neither do men pushing lawn mowers.

29 posted on 10/08/2002 5:30:28 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"This person is killing for sport,"

This is purely supposition! The facts are that this crime doesn't fit any previous profile for serial or mass killers. It seems to me to better fit the motive of Al Qaeda....

Mike

30 posted on 10/08/2002 5:30:38 AM PDT by MichaelP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
they are all licensed in Maryland and DC,

Aren't privatelly-owned guns outright banned in DC? I know so-called Assault Rifles and handguns are.

31 posted on 10/08/2002 5:31:57 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Another thing I can't understand is the one-shot thing. Doesn't seem like that wouldn't correspond to the profile of a thrill killer.

Someone mentioned that the reason for a single shot is to prevent triangulation of the sniping position. But how important is that?

32 posted on 10/08/2002 5:34:41 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
You might want to ask Carl Rowan.
33 posted on 10/08/2002 5:35:35 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
"...he may be providing a demonstration of just how effective such tactics could be."

Think this guy has read "Unintended Consequences'?

This very scenario is what scares the crap out of the liberal Socialists. They know there is no defense, and no real cover from a motivated sniper.

They are right to be afraid...very afraid.

34 posted on 10/08/2002 5:36:33 AM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Thrill killing???? I think not. One gentleman yesterday suggested it was a killer "with a cause". Needless to say no one wanted to discuss that possibility.
35 posted on 10/08/2002 5:39:44 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
The psychiatrist with the most aggressive personality and power is the one who is "right."

A very interesting observation. I'm gonna tuck this one away for future reference; I'll bet it has all sorts of applications outside psychiatry (how ironic that it applies to psychiatry itself though!).
36 posted on 10/08/2002 5:56:15 AM PDT by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Solid Oak
The motive of the shooter seems clear....inflict terror. Whether a member of a terrorist group or a lone terrorist, the shooter is none the less a terrorist - and he is being successful at inflicting terror on the citizens of the D.C. community.

Glad to see someone got it. This guy is affecting terror on a community. What caused him to be that way doesn't matter. He is a terrorist because of the affect created.

37 posted on 10/08/2002 6:28:26 AM PDT by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
"I guess it's getting to be really, really personal now."

I think this comment was a mistake. The last mistake was reassuring the parents which was listed in the article. I cringed when they were doing that, sunday night. But I am glad someone called them on it now. It was a invite and a dare to the gutless sniper. Moose needs to relise that when he holds these news conferences he is talking directly to the sniper.

39 posted on 10/08/2002 6:51:28 AM PDT by CJ Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
On the weekends, people are out and "just hanging-out". This would mean that the odds of being spotted increase significantly. I think this sniper is trained - either ex-military or state-terrorist. But, I admit, could be an amatuer wanting to go pro.
40 posted on 10/08/2002 7:26:32 AM PDT by M. T. Cicero II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson